|

Require Hydrotest?
Started by marthin_was, May 19 2009 07:15 AM
8 replies to this topic
Share this topic:
#1
Posted 19 May 2009 - 07:15 AM
Dear Forum,
Need your advice.
I have 24" piping spool that contains 24" orifice flange. We will hydrotest the piping package as per code.
My question : if later on we will change the orifice plate, do we need to re-hydotest the pipe spool?
thanks,
MW
Need your advice.
I have 24" piping spool that contains 24" orifice flange. We will hydrotest the piping package as per code.
My question : if later on we will change the orifice plate, do we need to re-hydotest the pipe spool?
thanks,
MW
#2
Posted 19 May 2009 - 02:44 PM
Do you hydrotest your spool with orifice plate ?
#3
Posted 20 May 2009 - 01:45 AM
Thats what requested by our operator. But I challenge the idea due to the plates may will broke.
QUOTE (JoeWong @ May 20 2009, 02:44 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Do you hydrotest your spool with orifice plate ?
#4
Posted 20 May 2009 - 09:21 AM
If you're testing through the orifice assembly, then I think it best to remove the plate and substitute a spacer. A benefit of doing it this way is that draining will be easier and more likely complete.
#5
Posted 21 May 2009 - 02:54 AM
If possible try to minimize items i.e. internal, control valves, etc which already hydrotested during fabrication stage. Minimize potential of unwanted damage of to these item .
#6
Posted 21 May 2009 - 03:17 AM
QUOTE (marthin_was @ May 20 2009, 11:45 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Thats what requested by our operator. But I challenge the idea due to the plates may will broke.
QUOTE (JoeWong @ May 20 2009, 02:44 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Do you hydrotest your spool with orifice plate ?
I understand
specially fabricated attachment; hydro test spools are employed/maintained at many refineries either at their workshops or through their service vendors; being a task repeated many a times therefore cost savings/ still ensuring requirement's fulfillment.
Hope this proves helping.
#7
Posted 21 May 2009 - 08:41 PM
thank you all for the reply
#8
Posted 22 May 2009 - 11:25 PM
Hydrostatic test is mandatory as per code requirement , usually such spool or line which contain flow meter, orifice and control valve etc , such items a need to be removed prior to hydrotest and line shall be tested with dummy fabricated spool .
#9
Posted 23 May 2009 - 02:05 AM
QUOTE (mkhan @ May 23 2009, 12:25 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
control valve etc , such items a need to be removed prior to hydrotest and line shall be tested with dummy fabricated spool .
You can avoid removing control valves provided that each side of the valve to be considered as boundary of a test package and blinded during hydrotest.
Similar Topics
Does Co2 Absorbers Require PassivationStarted by Guest_muthukmaar_* , 06 Jul 2020 |
|
![]() |
||
![]() How To Prepare 20 W 50 - Sl Product- Require TrainingStarted by Guest_mmtantawi_* , 29 May 2020 |
|
![]() |
||
![]() Hydrotest Sample P&idStarted by Guest_IonCube_* , 16 Oct 2019 |
|
![]() |
||
Hydrotest Pressure For Piping B31.3 - Significance Of Yield StrengthStarted by Guest_rs20170808@gmail.com_* , 12 Oct 2019 |
|
![]() |
||
How Small Is Too Small A Pipe To Require A Thermal Psv?Started by Guest_AlanInTexas_* , 17 Nov 2016 |
|
![]()
|