Hi Dear All;
I need to know the location of FT regarding of CV in process line,
I know it is better to install FT in upstream of CV it's that because if cavitation or fleshing accure
through control valve do not effect in measuring of FT, but in some P&ID i sow FT located in downstream of CV, i need to know the reasone.
if anybody can help me kindly please tell me standard, refrence book, or any referable document
and send me to srmehdipour@yahoo.ca.
Best Wishes
|
|
Flow Transmitter Location Regarding Of Control Valve
Started by saiedmehdipour, Jul 16 2009 07:03 AM
3 replies to this topic
Share this topic:
#1
Posted 16 July 2009 - 07:03 AM
#2
Posted 17 July 2009 - 07:27 AM
QUOTE (saiedmehdipour @ Jul 16 2009, 08:03 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Hi Dear All;
I need to know the location of FT regarding of CV in process line,
I know it is better to install FT in upstream of CV it's that because if cavitation or fleshing accure
through control valve do not effect in measuring of FT, but in some P&ID i sow FT located in downstream of CV, i need to know the reasone.
if anybody can help me kindly please tell me standard, refrence book, or any referable document
and send me to srmehdipour@yahoo.ca.
Best Wishes
I need to know the location of FT regarding of CV in process line,
I know it is better to install FT in upstream of CV it's that because if cavitation or fleshing accure
through control valve do not effect in measuring of FT, but in some P&ID i sow FT located in downstream of CV, i need to know the reasone.
if anybody can help me kindly please tell me standard, refrence book, or any referable document
and send me to srmehdipour@yahoo.ca.
Best Wishes
Generally,FIT installation location would be better upstream of relevant FCV (as you mentioned),especially in liquid containing lines to avoid two phase flow happening.
In cases there is no concern about the shortage of space,flashing/two phase flow.... (gas containing lines),feed back/feed forward control may dictate the location of FIT.
#3
Posted 04 August 2009 - 03:48 PM
I can think of no process reasons for locating the FT downstream of the control valve and several reasons, including those mentioned by you and fallah, to locate the FT upstream, as is commonly done. However, there may be non-process reasons such as layout issues that make the downstream configuration more desirable. As long as the process and measurement quality issues are properly addressed, it is not necessarily a problem to go with the downstream configuration. Measurements using an orifice and many other flow meters are more accurately accomplished in fully developed flow. About the worst location from a flow development point of view is downstream of a partially open modulating valve; i.e. the control valve.
#4
Posted 05 August 2009 - 10:11 AM
Normal Level IQ of mine suggests that
FT should always be upstream;
or wherever the flow is fully developed and pipeline is completely filled to ensure 'sensing of the system'
FT should always be upstream;
or wherever the flow is fully developed and pipeline is completely filled to ensure 'sensing of the system'
Similar Topics
Flow Through A Perforated PlateStarted by Guest_Ahmadhamzahperta_* , 13 Feb 2026 |
|
|
||
Gas-Liquid Pipe Flow Friction Loss CorrectionStarted by Guest_Huba_* , 18 Dec 2025 |
|
|
||
Software For Calculating Flow Through A PipeStarted by Guest_Deep24_* , 07 May 2018 |
|
|
||
Flow & Pressure Regulation For Compressible FluidsStarted by Guest_Abdessamed1961_* , 14 Dec 2025 |
|
|
||
Calculating Gas Flow Rate Without CvStarted by Guest_worrier_* , 25 Nov 2025 |
|
|

FB





