• Create Account

### Important Blog Entry

See this blog entry for an important update about two (2) of our services:

http://www.cheresources.com/invision/blog/1/entry-457-online-store-and-chexpress-run-coming-to-an-end/

# Fixed Water Spray Demand Calculations For Fire Protection Of Tanks / Vessels

Of late I have developed quite a bit of interest in HSE engineering and specifically related to Loss Prevention protection and I have been going through a lot of literature related to Loss Prevention and specifically related to fire protection.

When we talk of fire protection, some of the most comprehensive guidelines and standards developed for fire protection in the chemical process industry can be attributed to the "National Fire Protection Association" better known by its acronym NFPA. Today's blog entry makes an attempt to provide calculations for fixed water spray for fire protection of tanks and vessels based on their specific geometry or shape and as per the guidelines provided in NFPA 15 - "Standard for Water Spray Fixed Systems for Fire Protection"

Let us begin with what NFPA 15 has to say for "Vessels"

Section 7.4.2.1: Water spray shall be applied to vessel surfaces (including top and bottom surfaces of vertical vessels) at a net rate of not less than 0.25 gpm / ft2 [10.2 (L/min) /m2] of exposed surface.

Although the above statement does use the terminology exposed surface, for the sake of calculating the design spray water demand it is normal to consider the entire surface area of the vessel falling in a fire zone. In fact, the total spray water demand for one fire zone will be the sum of the spray water requirement for all the vessels and equipment in that fire zone. It is however possible, that when calculating peak demand for spray water for the entire plant or unit all the fire zones may not be considered simultaneously to require spray water. This is again based on the policy of the company for fire protection and can vary from place to place. This may also be dictated by the statutory requirments applicable for fire protection at the location of the plant or unit.

Let us go to the calculation part for spray water for tanks / vessels based on the geometry of the vessel.

Surface Area Calculations for Tanks / Vessels:

Cylindrical with conical roof and flat bottom:

SAcone = (π*D*L) + (π*(D/2)*S)

Cylindrical with 2:1 Ellipsoidal Dished Ends:

SA2:1 = (π*D*L) + (2*1.084*D2)

SAF&D = (π*D*L) + (2*0.9286*D2)

Sphere:

SAsphere = π*D2

where:

D = Diameter of the vessel (cylinder, sphere), ft (m)
L = Length of the cylinder (tan-to-tan), ft (m)
S = Slant height of cone, ft (m)

Once the surface area of the vessel is calculated, multiply it with 0.25 gpm if you are calculating your spray water demand per square feet (USC units) or with 10.2 L/min if calculating in square meters (Metric units).

Some companies require to add a margin on the calculated flow due to hydraulic imbalances in the spray water network and the ineffectiveness of run-down water on sprayed surfaces. Typically the margin used is 10% over the calculated flow.

For other equipment such as pumps and compressors NFPA 15 recommends a different spray water rate and states that:

7.3.2 Pumps, Compressors, and Related Equipment: Pumps or other devices that handle flammable liquids or gases shall have the shafts, seals, and othe critical parts enveloped by directed water spray at a net rate of not less than 0.50 gpm / ft2 [20.4 (L/min) / m2] of projected surface area of the equipment.

The difficult part for pumps and compressors is to estimate the surface area unlike tanks / vessels whose surface areas have been calculated as mentioned above. I would request a Loss Prevention specialist to provide some insight in calculating surface areas for these equipment.

For the vessels / tanks part, I have already prepared an excel workbook where you can select the vessel geometry from a drop-down list and it will automatically calculate the surface area for the selected vessel geometry and thus the spray water requirement.

Hope all of you enjoy this blog entry and I look forward to you comments and observations.

Regards,
Ankur.

sheiko
Excellent!!
ankur2061

Excellent!!

Thanks.

ChE's like you are an encouragement to better myself.

Regards,
Ankur
Qalander (Chem)
I like it Dear!
Mandak
I read through your Blog and its quite interesting. Good work I must state.

For pump and compressor, what we do is to use the footprint area to determine the water demand.

Regards.
Brilliant blog
vicdsm
Simple and concise presentation. Good work, Ankur.
mmangalaram
Dear Ankur,
Many thanks for your enlightment on fire water spray calculations.
Also, can you list the factors to be considered for fire proofing of the equipments and structures falling in the explosive zone.

Regards,
tahirraza217
We always expect a great and authentic work from your side.
Good Job
alzuhd
good work
rowal
thanks for the useful info. what would be the calculation for the piping in a pumping station? the same surface area correlation?
ankur2061
rowal,

NFPA 15 defines the spry water requirement for elevated pipe racks carrying multiple pipes and defines it in terms of ralck levels with a single rack close to grade requiring a spray water requirement of 0.25 gpm / ft2 (10.2 (L/min) / m2)

Regards,
Ankur.
AYACHI DHAFER
GOOD WORK
SARATHY.P.K
Dear Ankur,
Well explained . Thanks for sharing

Sarathy
eduardoeduardo
Very good job Ankur
mikangmx

Goog work, thak you

gud job

i have one question for selection spray nozzle ,what is the percentage of area coverage what must be sprayed, is there any restriction?, in the nfpa 15 7.4.2.3 shows only 6 ft 7 ft spacing between spray nozzles, and dont indicate axial distance from nozzle to horizontal vessel. here in my country authorities have the idea is required 100% coverage but is it necessary this?, is Required in the nfpa 15?

lcotrufo

sukanta87

Dear Ankur,

Many many thanks.

PremP

Well explained sir. Appreciate it!

### Latest Visitors

Today, 03:51 AM
• Hanif7x
Today, 01:28 AM
• Khoa
Yesterday, 08:53 PM
• nahmed
Yesterday, 12:52 PM
• Fakhri
Yesterday, 07:59 AM
• saymo
Yesterday, 07:58 AM