Dear colleague engineers,
I'm involved in a design for a relief system for new storage tanks. It has been a while and I was used to the old version of API 2000. I found out in the different fora, the discussion of the differences between the old and the new API 2000 standards etc.
Something which is still concerning to me is the following:
The tanks are designed in accordance with European standard EN14015. This standard is also specifying calculation methods for fire relief cases, however I started with the latest API 2000 standard. For some reason, I thought the fire relief case sounded high to me and I checked it with the EN 14015 method and guess what? It's significantly different.
Let's take the "standard fluid" Hexane. The wetted area is 22 m2.
According to API 2000 6th edition table 7, this gives a relief rate of 6217 Nm3/h (see attachment)
When I calculate it via the formula in chapter 4.3.3.3.2 (see attachment) I get a relief rate of 6961 Nm3/h
When I calculate is via the spreadsheet of Ankur's Emergency Venting Due To Fire From Atmospheric Storage Tanks spreadsheet, I get 6245 Nm3/h.
So far, so good (slight differences might be due to different assumed temperatures)
When I calculate it via L.12 in EN14015 (see attachment) (which according to API is incorporated in API 2000: "This International Standard was developed from the 5th edition of API Std 2000 and EN 14015:2005, with the intent that the 6th edition of API Std 2000 be identical to this International Standard"), I get only 3004 Nm3/h. The simplified formula for hexane: UFB = 238 Aw0,82 obviously shows the same result: 238 x 220,82 = 3002 Nm3/h.
It must have to do with the ratio tankvolume vs. wetted area (see attachment). At larger diameters this ratio is getting higher (better). Still seems odd to me that API takes this phenomenon into account and EN does not.
Any thoughts on this?
Thanks in advance,
Enrico
Attached Files
Edited by Enrico Lammers, 22 January 2014 - 06:26 AM.