|

3% Rulle, Absolute Or Relative Basis ?
Started by MFAHOS, Jul 25 2009 05:50 AM
9 replies to this topic
Share this topic:
#1
Posted 25 July 2009 - 05:50 AM
Hi everybody
my quesion is about the ratio (Pressure drop in line upstream PSV) / (PSV set pressure) which shall not exceed 3% as per API RP 520,
shall it be calculated based on Absolute or Relative basis?
Exemple:
Pressure Drop = 0.3 bar
Set Pressure = 8 barg = 9.01 bara
the ratio is (0.3/8) or (0.3/9.01) ??
thanks
my quesion is about the ratio (Pressure drop in line upstream PSV) / (PSV set pressure) which shall not exceed 3% as per API RP 520,
shall it be calculated based on Absolute or Relative basis?
Exemple:
Pressure Drop = 0.3 bar
Set Pressure = 8 barg = 9.01 bara
the ratio is (0.3/8) or (0.3/9.01) ??
thanks
#2
Posted 25 July 2009 - 06:15 AM
QUOTE (MFAHOS @ Jul 25 2009, 12:50 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Hi everybody
my quesion is about the ratio (Pressure drop in line upstream PSV) / (PSV set pressure) which shall not exceed 3% as per API RP 520,
shall it be calculated based on Absolute or Relative basis?
Exemple:
Pressure Drop = 0.3 bar
Set Pressure = 8 barg = 9.01 bara
the ratio is (0.3/8) or (0.3/9.01) ??
Hi,
Pressure drop is absolute in nature (pressure diffrence). Hence the ratio should be in absolute terms (logically speaking)
A.King
thanks
my quesion is about the ratio (Pressure drop in line upstream PSV) / (PSV set pressure) which shall not exceed 3% as per API RP 520,
shall it be calculated based on Absolute or Relative basis?
Exemple:
Pressure Drop = 0.3 bar
Set Pressure = 8 barg = 9.01 bara
the ratio is (0.3/8) or (0.3/9.01) ??
Hi,
Pressure drop is absolute in nature (pressure diffrence). Hence the ratio should be in absolute terms (logically speaking)
A.King
thanks
#3
Posted 25 July 2009 - 06:23 AM
QUOTE (MFAHOS @ Jul 25 2009, 05:50 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Hi everybody
my quesion is about the ratio (Pressure drop in line upstream PSV) / (PSV set pressure) which shall not exceed 3% as per API RP 520,
shall it be calculated based on Absolute or Relative basis?
Exemple:
Pressure Drop = 0.3 bar
Set Pressure = 8 barg = 9.01 bara
the ratio is (0.3/8) or (0.3/9.01) ??
thanks
my quesion is about the ratio (Pressure drop in line upstream PSV) / (PSV set pressure) which shall not exceed 3% as per API RP 520,
shall it be calculated based on Absolute or Relative basis?
Exemple:
Pressure Drop = 0.3 bar
Set Pressure = 8 barg = 9.01 bara
the ratio is (0.3/8) or (0.3/9.01) ??
thanks
As far as i know 0.3/8 would be correct.
#4
Posted 27 July 2009 - 10:49 AM
QUOTE (NGL Licensor @ Jul 25 2009, 07:15 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Pressure drop is absolute in nature (pressure diffrence). Hence the ratio should be in absolute terms (logically speaking)
What is the meaning of "pressure drop absolute in nature" ?
3% rule refer to set pressure in gauge. Change in barometric pressure will not affect the ratio for a specific PSV...
#5
Posted 27 July 2009 - 11:01 AM
QUOTE (JoeWong @ Jul 27 2009, 05:49 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
QUOTE (NGL Licensor @ Jul 25 2009, 07:15 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Pressure drop is absolute in nature (pressure diffrence). Hence the ratio should be in absolute terms (logically speaking)
What is the meaning of "pressure drop absolute in nature" ?
3% rule refer to set pressure in gauge. Change in barometric pressure will not affect the ratio for a specific PSV...
Pressure drop is in absolute units. If the 3 % rule refers to set pressure in gauge, as you stated, so it should be 0.3/8
#6
Posted 27 July 2009 - 11:39 AM
Can you elaborate a bit more what do you mean by "Pressure drop is in absolute units" ?
I have heard of pressure in absolute unit... i have heard of pressure drop is pressure difference between two points and it can the difference between two absolute pressure or two gauge pressure...I am sorry. I still can not appreciate above sentence "Pressure drop is in absolute units".
I have heard of pressure in absolute unit... i have heard of pressure drop is pressure difference between two points and it can the difference between two absolute pressure or two gauge pressure...I am sorry. I still can not appreciate above sentence "Pressure drop is in absolute units".
#7
Posted 27 July 2009 - 11:44 AM
QUOTE (JoeWong @ Jul 27 2009, 06:39 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Can you elaborate a bit more what do you mean by "Pressure drop is in absolute units" ?
I have heard of pressure in absolute unit... i have heard of pressure drop is pressure difference between two points and it can the difference between two absolute pressure or two gauge pressure...I am sorry. I still can not appreciate above sentence "Pressure drop is in absolute units".
I have heard of pressure in absolute unit... i have heard of pressure drop is pressure difference between two points and it can the difference between two absolute pressure or two gauge pressure...I am sorry. I still can not appreciate above sentence "Pressure drop is in absolute units".
I meant in both cases you shall end-up with pressure difference in absolute not in gauge since it is a difference between two values. Example, for a pump, if the suction pressure is 10 bar and discharge is 25 bara then the pressure difference is 10 bar. The same difference is true even if the above values are in gauge units i.e barag. Hope you appreciate now
#8
Posted 27 July 2009 - 01:12 PM
QUOTE (NGL Licensor @ Jul 27 2009, 11:44 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I meant in both cases you shall end-up with pressure difference in absolute not in gauge since it is a difference between two values. Example, for a pump, if the suction pressure is 10 bar and discharge is 25 bara then the pressure difference is 10 bar. The same difference is true even if the above values are in gauge units i.e barag. Hope you appreciate now
Joe Wong is absolutely going on right track.
In calculating pressure difference two pressure values should be considered on the same basis,both in gauge or both in absolute.
IMO,the pressure difference is nominated neither absolute nor gauge.
I think you meant the pressure difference for the pump you mentioned would be 15 bar.Am i right?
#9
Posted 28 July 2009 - 06:14 AM
the answer of the thread topic already done by fallah, which is (0.3/8).
In my opinion, its already clear.
The state is come from API RP 520 part II.
RP = Recommended Practice.
So it is just recommended from API 520. You can follow it, otherwise not follow the 3% rule also not wrong (for special condition maybe).
In my opinion, its already clear.

The state is come from API RP 520 part II.
RP = Recommended Practice.
So it is just recommended from API 520. You can follow it, otherwise not follow the 3% rule also not wrong (for special condition maybe).


#10
Posted 29 July 2009 - 03:48 PM
The 3% originated in the ASME Code (Section VIII); however, it's only specified as '3%' in the non-madatory Appendix M (Paragraph M-6), and then is only applicable to compressible service (by the letter of the Code, but not necessarly the intent). It's based on an old study performed (at the U of Michigan, I believe) where it was determined that most PSVs would blowdown about 7-10%, so, to prevent chattering of the valve, 3% was sort of arbitrarily chosen. It is calculated on 3% of the gauge opening pressure.
As far as compliance with it goes, many companies have internal standards that allow higher values, particulatly on incompressible service (5% seems to be fairly common). However, API RP 520 Pt 2 does state that using a higher value should be supported with an 'engineering analysis.' As far as being 'only' an RP, well, that's up to you, but obviously, if anything were to ever happened, you're on the hook for explaining why you deviated from a recognized industry standard. 520 Pt 1 was recently reissued as a Standard rather than an RP, and I would imagine that the next revision of Pt. 2 would also include issuance as a Standard rather than an RP.
As far as compliance with it goes, many companies have internal standards that allow higher values, particulatly on incompressible service (5% seems to be fairly common). However, API RP 520 Pt 2 does state that using a higher value should be supported with an 'engineering analysis.' As far as being 'only' an RP, well, that's up to you, but obviously, if anything were to ever happened, you're on the hook for explaining why you deviated from a recognized industry standard. 520 Pt 1 was recently reissued as a Standard rather than an RP, and I would imagine that the next revision of Pt. 2 would also include issuance as a Standard rather than an RP.
Similar Topics
Aspen Plus - Is There A Function To Determine The Relative Quantites OStarted by Guest_EdJones90_* , 11 Sep 2020 |
|
![]() |
||
Problem With Writing Offshore Plant Design BasisStarted by Guest_Doneisbetterthenperfect_* , 01 Dec 2023 |
|
![]() |
||
Relative Humidity In Aspen PlusStarted by Guest_CHEMSTRONG_* , 25 Jul 2022 |
|
![]() |
||
Refinery Simulation File And BasisStarted by Guest_Danish John Paul_* , 22 Oct 2020 |
|
![]() |
||
![]() Solved On A Dry Basis But Stream Has WaterStarted by Guest_chemproc_* , 17 Oct 2019 |
|
![]() |