|

Propane Desulfurization Package Before/after Storage
#1
Posted 07 August 2010 - 01:56 AM
We use propane (97 wt%) as the feed of our plant. Propane is supplied from Outside battery limit, stored in high pressure spherical storage tanks and then pumped to the plant. The owner has decided to install a propane desulphurization package (with adsorption mechanism)propane line. I should perform a study about the location of this package.
My question is: should this package be placed before the storage tanks or before entering the main plant? Personally, I think the answer to this question relies only on cases of emergency shutdown. In another word, we should investigate which scheme would have the lowest impact on our plant and its feed if we have an emergency shutdown event. I would be thankful to hear your feedbacks on this issue.
#2
Posted 07 August 2010 - 03:44 AM
#3
Posted 07 August 2010 - 05:00 AM
Thank you so much. Actually, I am sorry I forgot to add something maybe important to the description:
The desulphurization package outlet sulphur content is zero. However, we need a minimum sulphur content in propane for some reasons. Therefore, the desulphurization system is using a bypass system in a way that a three-way valve is located upstream of the package and the outlet of package is analyzed for sulphur. the sulphur content of the package outlet, is adjusted by the bypass flowrate to maintain a predetermined amount of sulphur entering the plant.
Now my question is that: would this bypass system affect the location of our package (downstream or upstream)?
#4
Posted 07 August 2010 - 05:35 AM
If the only controlled source of Propane is from your storage tank, then you don't have any choice but to install Adsorber unit downstream of storage tank.
#5
Posted 07 August 2010 - 08:40 AM
Dear All,
We use propane (97 wt%) as the feed of our plant. Propane is supplied from Outside battery limit, stored in high pressure spherical storage tanks and then pumped to the plant. The owner has decided to install a propane desulphurization package (with adsorption mechanism)propane line. I should perform a study about the location of this package.
My question is: should this package be placed before the storage tanks or before entering the main plant? Personally, I think the answer to this question relies only on cases of emergency shutdown. In another word, we should investigate which scheme would have the lowest impact on our plant and its feed if we have an emergency shutdown event. I would be thankful to hear your feedbacks on this issue.
Process Persia:
Please stop making multiple posts of the same identical topic in different Forums. I have stated numerous times that it is against Forum policy to do so and it gains you no added value to your posting. It only causes confusion and the inability to organize and handle the responses - if any.
I have deleted your other posting. PLEASE STOP THIS PRACTICE. I am getting tired of deleting multiple postings because I don't know which one has priority and where they are located.
#6
Posted 07 August 2010 - 11:44 PM
With all respect, I should say that It was not my fault. Honestly, sometimes when I post the topic, I recieve an error from the website, then I try to post the topic again. but after a while I see two posts with the same topic. Believe me that it was not intentional. I will always do my best to follow the rules and regilations.
Sorry again
#7
Posted 08 August 2010 - 04:56 AM
I am attaching a sketch of the options we discussed. now lets imagine these cases:
1) Sulphur removal package upstream of tanks: the tank is initially filling with on-spec propane, then something causes the sulphur removal package to shut down for a while. during this time, propane with high sulphur content will be added to the tank. however, due to the large volume of the tank, this flowrate will not affect the sulphur content of the tank outlet flow.
2)Sulphur removal package downstream of tanks: in this case, the tank is always full of propane with high sulphur content. if anything causes the sulphur package to shutdown, we will have a flow of high sulphur content to our plant until this package is back into the service.
This suggests that case 1 is better from the ESD point of view. Am I right?
Attached Files
#8
Posted 08 August 2010 - 10:11 AM
Option (1) certainly looks better from availability point of view, but if there are any constraints regarding incoming Propane quality or flow control upstream of Adsorber unit, you have to address those issues first. What are the feed specifications for downstream processing plant?
Await your reply.
#9
Posted 09 August 2010 - 12:04 AM
I checked the PIDs and there was only a flow control valve at battery limit and no analyzer. So we have only control on the flowrate.
The feed contains 80 ppm wt sulphur at battery limit and after the desulphurization package it should reach 35 ppm wt.
Best
Edited by process_persia, 09 August 2010 - 12:06 AM.
#10
Posted 09 August 2010 - 11:51 AM
This option will not work in the case you have to receive larger quantities of untreated Propane than your Adsorber Unit can handle, or if the Sulfur content of incoming Propane cannot be removed by the Adsorber unit down to the required levels. As said, recycle line from the tank to the Adsorber would help in such scenario, but you have to evaluate all possible options before making the final decision. There are always trade-offs whichever design you choose for your plant.
Best regards,
#11
Posted 09 August 2010 - 12:53 PM
Many thanks for your instructive reply. I'll try to study the existing trade-offs and make a suitable choice based on our discussions.
Thanks again
Similar Topics
Selection Type Of Heater For Refrigerated PropaneStarted by Guest_livetolove003_* , 07 May 2025 |
|
![]() |
||
Discussion - Predict Storage Tank Heat Transfer Precisely By Jimmy D KStarted by Guest_raj shekhar_* , 25 Mar 2025 |
|
![]() |
||
Off Spec Condensate Storage TankStarted by Guest_shekhar dhuri_* , 05 Sep 2013 |
|
![]()
|
||
![]() Butadine Storage And HandlingStarted by Guest_engmmostafaa22_* , 08 Feb 2025 |
|
![]() |
||
![]() Storage Tanks Diked Area Fire Protection Using Foam MakerStarted by Guest_mkhattaby_* , 30 Jan 2025 |
|
![]() |