|

Reactor Volume
Started by polipo, Aug 31 2010 04:43 AM
2 replies to this topic
Share this topic:
#1
Posted 31 August 2010 - 04:43 AM
Hi there,
I have problem with sizing a reactor. As I've selected the weight of the catalyst for the reaction, so I converted to the reactor's volume by W = ρcV(1-Є). And I solve for V where void fraction is known. The problem is the residence time. It is only 0.1 second. Does it make sense? for the flow of about 100000 kg/h.
One thing I'm unsure is about the volume. Can it be larger than what I've obtained from calculation. If so, I further wonder that whether the void fraction will not be the same according to the equation stated earlier.
Or I've misunderstood some points?
Thank you for your assistance
I have problem with sizing a reactor. As I've selected the weight of the catalyst for the reaction, so I converted to the reactor's volume by W = ρcV(1-Є). And I solve for V where void fraction is known. The problem is the residence time. It is only 0.1 second. Does it make sense? for the flow of about 100000 kg/h.
One thing I'm unsure is about the volume. Can it be larger than what I've obtained from calculation. If so, I further wonder that whether the void fraction will not be the same according to the equation stated earlier.
Or I've misunderstood some points?
Thank you for your assistance
#2
Posted 31 August 2010 - 04:04 PM
How did you select the weight of catalyst. I presume it is based on a flowrate of reactants you want to treat (react). A residence time of 0.1 second is not necessarily nonsensical. The reactor volume can be as large as you want to make it, and you can "spread out" the catalyst if desired in order to lower its density. However, this is the opposite of the direction we would normally want to move in as engineers. So tell us more.
#3
Posted 01 September 2010 - 01:24 PM
How did you select the weight of catalyst. I presume it is based on a flowrate of reactants you want to treat (react). A residence time of 0.1 second is not necessarily nonsensical. The reactor volume can be as large as you want to make it, and you can "spread out" the catalyst if desired in order to lower its density. However, this is the opposite of the direction we would normally want to move in as engineers. So tell us more.
I used ASPEN PLUS to do sensitivity analysis and select the weight of catalysy that yield the maximum product. Then I convert the weight of catalyst by the formula I mentioned earlier.
Similar Topics
![]() Steam Flow And Heating Time In Batch ReactorStarted by Guest_seagal6_* , 16 Jul 2025 |
|
![]() |
||
![]() Multi-Tubular Packed Bed ReactorStarted by Guest_shambola_* , 12 Feb 2025 |
|
![]() |
||
![]() Help On Simulation Of Reactor In Aspen PlusStarted by Guest_m.ghaziasgar_* , 06 Jan 2025 |
|
![]() |
||
Secondary Heating Loop For ReactorStarted by Guest_TheChemEng_* , 28 Nov 2024 |
|
![]() |
||
![]() Constant Volume Vs Constant Mass Flow Of Centrifugal CompressorsStarted by Guest_panoska_* , 18 Nov 2024 |
|
![]() |