Padmakar,
The above guideline (80% of the equilibrium loading) should be taken as maximum loading you can achieve in an amine treating system. You can model for lower loadings depending upon your system requirements.
You are right in saying “It's the always one's judgment who is working on conceptualization /configuration of the unit.” It’s a common practice in modeling amine treating systems to follow some available guidelines (e.g. GPSA, Hysys) for max/min loadings and then select a most suitable loading based on, as you said, conceptualization /configuration of the unit. But, in software like Hysys, how can one know how much system is away from equilibrium? Let’s assume I have selected 0.4 loading based on my judgment. This loading might be the most suitable & most optimum for my system. But it does not tell me how much my system has approached to equilibrium.
The attached paper says followings in this regard:
Page 3, “A rich loading of 0.4 mole to-mole means one thing in a system operating at 10 bar (145psi) versus a system operating at 70 bar (1015psi).”
Page 4, When plants are designed, typically the maximum loading guidelines are set or represented as an approach to the equilibrium set by the VLE data. For example, some engineering companies and operating companies will specify that the plant will be designed with a maximum loading of 80 per cent of equilibrium. This means that they will set the design around the process conditions to load the solvent to 80 per cent of the value of the equilibrium set by the VLE data.
Page 4, “Therefore, instead of setting an arbitrary rich loading on a mole-to-mole basis, the maximum rich loading needs to be set as a percent of equilibrium and then translated back to a mole-to-mole basis for monitoring purposes.”
P.S. "Gas Purification" by Kohl and Nielsen also recommends to use 75-80% approach to equilibrium.
Thanks
Edited by P.Engr, 12 October 2010 - 12:23 AM.