Jump to content



Featured Articles

Check out the latest featured articles.

File Library

Check out the latest downloads available in the File Library.

New Article

Product Viscosity vs. Shear

Featured File

Vertical Tank Selection

New Blog Entry

Low Flow in Pipes- posted in Ankur's blog

Peng Robinson Quick Question


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
7 replies to this topic
Share this topic:
| More

#1 adw07

adw07

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • 20 posts

Posted 20 July 2011 - 04:00 AM

Hi all,

I making a model applying the Peng-Robinson equation of state but all of the sources (I've checked quite a few) are a bit ambiguous as to which mole fractions to use in the cubic equation:

Z^3 + (1-B ) Z^2 + (A-3B^2 - 2B) Z + (B^2 + B^3 - AB) = 0

Where A = Sum( Sum ( xi xj Aij ))) and B = Sum ( xi Bi). (Here using liquid mole fractions, x)

Individually A and B are different if you use x, y or z. Can anyone tell me which mole fractions should be used? Thanks for any help.

#2 MrShorty

MrShorty

    Gold Member

  • ChE Plus Subscriber
  • 517 posts

Posted 20 July 2011 - 10:09 AM

Unless there's more to the question than I'm seeing:

Use x if you are calculating the properties of a liquid phase.
Use y if you are calculating the properties of a vapor phase.
Use z if you are calculating the properties of a feed (assuming said feed is single phase).

#3 adw07

adw07

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • 20 posts

Posted 20 July 2011 - 11:20 AM

Thanks for your reply.

The cubic equation needs to be solved to find the compressibilities of both the vapour and liquid phases, Zv and Zl. In the two phase region three real roots are produced, the smallest is Zl and the largest Zv.

My question is, since the cubic equation yields both the vapour and liquid compressibilities, which mole fraction is used to define the parameters A and B used in the cubic equation?

From the initial calculations I've done so far, each mole fraction set (z,y and x) give different results,with x giving the most reasonable solutions.

I am unsure why the liquid mole fractions should define the compressibility for both phases, or am I missing something?
Thanks

#4 breizh

breizh

    Gold Member

  • Admin
  • 6,730 posts

Posted 20 July 2011 - 07:53 PM

Hi ,
Additional input :

http://www.ceb.cam.a...hermo/pure.html

hope this helps

Breizh

#5 MrShorty

MrShorty

    Gold Member

  • ChE Plus Subscriber
  • 517 posts

Posted 21 July 2011 - 09:57 AM

The answer is still the same. This means that in a VLE routine, where you have two phases, you will have two sets of parameters. One set based on x, from which you will calculate Zliq. Another set based on y, from which you will calculate Zvap.

#6 amitkatyal.asim

amitkatyal.asim

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • 11 posts

Posted 24 July 2011 - 01:07 AM

The answer is still the same. This means that in a VLE routine, where you have two phases, you will have two sets of parameters. One set based on x, from which you will calculate Zliq. Another set based on y, from which you will calculate Zvap.



A readymade product of the type you wish to make is available at www.eq-comp.com. You can check it out.

#7 adw07

adw07

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • 20 posts

Posted 26 July 2011 - 08:24 AM

OK guys thanks for the help, I'll use the mole fractions for each phase to define the other properties for that phase.

#8 adw07

adw07

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • 20 posts

Posted 02 August 2011 - 04:23 AM

Hi, further to my initial query the flash solver for my uni project is now up and running. However, although it is generally giving good results for certain conditions it is:

a) converging to a trivial solution (Initial Phase Stability Analysis (Michelson 1982b) shows mixture is 2 - phase, however the the iteration process converges to a vapour fraciton of 1 )

b ) Not converging at all - Maximum iterations in inner loop reached (which minimises fugacity difference)

c) Giving values outside acceptable physical constraints i.e. vapour fraction less than zero

Can anyone please point me in the direction of any information sources about dealing with these problems / or offer any suggestions on how to alleviate them? Since this is only a small part in the background of my model it needs to be robust to handle the majority of input conditions.
Any help much appreciated, thanks




Similar Topics