Does PED "grandfather" equipment and relief installations that pre-dated implementation of PED?
For example, Stoomwezen (Netherlands) allowed rupture disks to be set at 110% of MAWP, whereas that's not allowed in any of the current harmonized EU standards. Do the PED rules mandate that that disk be replaced with one that bursts no higher than MAWP?
If the existing disk is grandfathered, is it just that specific disk that's grandfathered or is the installation grandfathered? In other words, when the existing disk is replaced, does the replacement disk have to be designed according to current rules. Or, can replacement disks continue to be specified according to the original design code?
|

Pressure Equip Directive Compliance For Earlier Installations
Started by Lowflo, Dec 07 2011 04:21 PM
No replies to this topic
Share this topic:
#1
Posted 07 December 2011 - 04:21 PM
Similar Topics
Steam Pressure In Heat ExchangerStarted by Guest_mvanrijnbach_* , 15 Apr 2025 |
|
![]() |
||
Critical Pressure For Choke Valve SizingStarted by Guest_Sherif Morsi_* , 07 Nov 2017 |
|
![]() |
||
![]() Valve Cavity - Pressure Relief ValveStarted by Guest_CS10_* , 20 Feb 2025 |
|
![]() |
||
Pressure Of An Isolated Flow In PipeStarted by Guest_phoroogh_* , 30 Jan 2025 |
|
![]() |
||
![]() Maximum Allowable Accumulated PressureStarted by Guest_mahmooddalvi09_* , 30 Jan 2025 |
|
![]() |