Does PED "grandfather" equipment and relief installations that pre-dated implementation of PED?
For example, Stoomwezen (Netherlands) allowed rupture disks to be set at 110% of MAWP, whereas that's not allowed in any of the current harmonized EU standards. Do the PED rules mandate that that disk be replaced with one that bursts no higher than MAWP?
If the existing disk is grandfathered, is it just that specific disk that's grandfathered or is the installation grandfathered? In other words, when the existing disk is replaced, does the replacement disk have to be designed according to current rules. Or, can replacement disks continue to be specified according to the original design code?
|

Pressure Equip Directive Compliance For Earlier Installations
Started by Lowflo, Dec 07 2011 04:21 PM
No replies to this topic
Share this topic:
#1
Posted 07 December 2011 - 04:21 PM
Similar Topics
![]() Rupture Disc Failure Well Below Max PressureStarted by Guest_vaibhav02_* , Yesterday, 04:22 AM |
|
![]() |
||
![]() Distillation Column Top PressureStarted by Guest_halkeshhulk_* , 27 Jun 2025 |
|
![]() |
||
![]() Recommended Installation Location For "pressure High" InterlocStarted by Guest_omupei_* , 20 Jun 2025 |
|
![]() |
||
![]() Distillation Tower Top And Bottom Temperature And PressureStarted by Guest_student55_* , 27 Mar 2016 |
|
![]()
|
||
Steam Pressure In Heat ExchangerStarted by Guest_mvanrijnbach_* , 15 Apr 2025 |
|
![]() |