Forums
Blogs
Articles
File Library
FAQ
Search
FB
Dear All
I think there is a confusion created while using the equation for flow rate calculations for External fire case (API 521 section 3.15.2.1 equation 8).
If we use the equation directly without checking the minimum recommended value of Environmental Factor, we end up in wrong results. Fortunately my calculations were checked & error discovered !!!
|
|
Psv Sizing For Fire Case
Started by Guest_Kiran G Parihar_*, Mar 07 2006 05:00 AM
3 replies to this topic
Share this topic:
#2
kdal
-
- Members
-
- 13 posts
Junior Member
Posted 07 March 2006 - 07:17 AM
care to expand on what the "error" or confusion is?
#3
pleckner
-
- ChE Plus Subscriber
-
- 564 posts
Gold Member
Posted 07 March 2006 - 12:52 PM
I agree with "Kdal"; ;what's the error?
There is no "recommended" environmental factor, just what is allowed. The environmental factor can be used to reduce the required relieving capacity of a system (reduce the relieving rate because I have approved insulation or good drainage or good fire fighting ability/sprinkers). You have the choice to use them or not. The codes do restrict their use so you can't just apply all you want haphazardly. If you chose to use too many of them, then yes, this would be an error. If you just didn't use what you are allowed to use, well, then you get a larger relief than you might otherwise. Is this an error? I wouldn't classify it as such.
There is no "recommended" environmental factor, just what is allowed. The environmental factor can be used to reduce the required relieving capacity of a system (reduce the relieving rate because I have approved insulation or good drainage or good fire fighting ability/sprinkers). You have the choice to use them or not. The codes do restrict their use so you can't just apply all you want haphazardly. If you chose to use too many of them, then yes, this would be an error. If you just didn't use what you are allowed to use, well, then you get a larger relief than you might otherwise. Is this an error? I wouldn't classify it as such.
#4
Guest_Kiran G Parihar_*
Guest_Kiran G Parihar_*
-
- guestGuests
Posted 07 March 2006 - 11:13 PM
Sorry my mistake. Its not the Environment Factor F but F' that I was referring to.
Equation no 8 is derived from equation 2 (API 520) & Equation 5 & 6 (API 521). In one of the cases that I was calculating, the value of F' was much below 0.01. In that case if we use equation 8 directly, the value of W comes out to be very low. So what we did was taking the value of F' as 0.01 & once again rearranging Equation 2 (API 520) calculated the value of W. Thats why I think equation 8 has to be used with care.
Thanks
Kiran G Parihar
Equation no 8 is derived from equation 2 (API 520) & Equation 5 & 6 (API 521). In one of the cases that I was calculating, the value of F' was much below 0.01. In that case if we use equation 8 directly, the value of W comes out to be very low. So what we did was taking the value of F' as 0.01 & once again rearranging Equation 2 (API 520) calculated the value of W. Thats why I think equation 8 has to be used with care.
Thanks
Kiran G Parihar
Similar Topics
Liquid Liquid Separator SizingStarted by Guest_Kentucky08_* , 03 Apr 2025 |
|
|
||
Critical Pressure For Choke Valve SizingStarted by Guest_Sherif Morsi_* , 07 Nov 2017 |
|
|
||
Alkaline Electrolytic Cell/stack Sizing/design For H2 ProductionStarted by Guest_BRS09_* , 13 Mar 2025 |
|
|
||
Batch Adsorption: H/d Ratio For Vessel SizingStarted by Guest_Victor_process_Engineer_* , 28 Feb 2025 |
|
|
||
Separator Sizing Step By Step ProcedureStarted by Guest_krishnamurthy_* , 06 Apr 2023 |
|
|
