Jump to content



Featured Articles

Check out the latest featured articles.

File Library

Check out the latest downloads available in the File Library.

New Article

Product Viscosity vs. Shear

Featured File

Vertical Tank Selection

New Blog Entry

Low Flow in Pipes- posted in Ankur's blog

Fugacity Of N-Butane

chemical engineering fugacity

This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
4 replies to this topic
Share this topic:
| More

#1 Gilnaz Pourhossein

Gilnaz Pourhossein

    Brand New Member

  • Members
  • 3 posts

Posted 22 April 2016 - 01:40 PM

Hi

Can anybody please help me to find fugacity of n-Butane using the following formula:

p = 5 pa      and      T = 500° k

pv = 4155.8 - 209.9p - 5.186p2 - 1.448p3 + 0.2079p4

I have tried to solve it using the following way but couldn't manage to do so:


tej65c43wr3aizku9whr.jpg

any help is appreciated  wink.gifwink.gifwink.gif

Regards



#2 MrShorty

MrShorty

    Gold Member

  • ChE Plus Subscriber
  • 517 posts

Posted 22 April 2016 - 02:46 PM

A couple of observations:

 

You take your pv=expression, appear to say that you are going to divide it by RT to get an expression for z. Then you divide the pv= expression by p to solve it for v, but call it z. You might check these steps carefully to make sure you are assigning the expression to the right variable.

 

In your integration, your integrand is (v-RT/p)dp. In the next step, you substitute v into the integrand. I observe that you seem to have left out the -209.9 term from the expression for v or z, and also neglect to include the -RT/P term.

 

Does that help?



#3 Gilnaz Pourhossein

Gilnaz Pourhossein

    Brand New Member

  • Members
  • 3 posts

Posted 22 April 2016 - 04:39 PM

A couple of observations:

 

You take your pv=expression, appear to say that you are going to divide it by RT to get an expression for z. Then you divide the pv= expression by p to solve it for v, but call it z. You might check these steps carefully to make sure you are assigning the expression to the right variable.

 

In your integration, your integrand is (v-RT/p)dp. In the next step, you substitute v into the integrand. I observe that you seem to have left out the -209.9 term from the expression for v or z, and also neglect to include the -RT/P term.

 

Does that help?

Dear Mr/Mrs

 

Thanks for ur valuable help......

 

I have made some corrections and what I've got is as follow:

 

 

wh6j4co2e17b278t2hj2.jpg

 

 

but I'm still not able to get the final result.....

 

any other tips to make me clear how to get the final result would be a great help to me.....

 

 

Thank you in advance....



#4 Mahdi1980

Mahdi1980

    Gold Member

  • Members
  • 182 posts

Posted 23 April 2016 - 01:56 AM   Best Answer

gpn123

 

You have derived the last term of integral wrong. It is not RT/P2. It is RTln P since the integral of RT/P dP is RT ln P.

Ok?

And if you replace the values of R (8.314) and T (500 K) in the result equation you can see that the first term of ln P and the last term that have lnP will be omitted since 4155.8 lnp/(8.314*500) = lnP so lnP- lnP =0

The remaining items are determined by replacing P=5 pa

So ln (fi)= -0.275

fi= exp( -0.275) =0.76

 

if you have a question please ask

 

Mahdi



#5 Gilnaz Pourhossein

Gilnaz Pourhossein

    Brand New Member

  • Members
  • 3 posts

Posted 23 April 2016 - 09:38 AM

gpn123

 

You have derived the last term of integral wrong. It is not RT/P2. It is RTln P since the integral of RT/P dP is RT ln P.

Ok?

And if you replace the values of R (8.314) and T (500 K) in the result equation you can see that the first term of ln P and the last term that have lnP will be omitted since 4155.8 lnp/(8.314*500) = lnP so lnP- lnP =0

The remaining items are determined by replacing P=5 pa

So ln (fi)= -0.275

fi= exp( -0.275) =0.76

 

if you have a question please ask

 

Mahdi

 

Dear Mahdi

 

Dorood

 

I was a bit foggy by the time i was solving this equation since it was almost twilight. Reading your post was like all the fog has lifted.

 

Thanks for all those explanations.....

 

Bedrood.....






Similar Topics