You are asking two questions as I understand it:
- The first is how you make both flow to be similar. The way to do it is that the pressure drop at the entry point is the main pressure drop in your system and to ensure that on both inlets is equal at the same flow.
- On the second, the velocity and the way it should enter is very application specific since it depends on the rheology of the fluid, the way it wets the walls, the foaming tendency of the fluid, the presence of bubbles, etc, etc. As someone mentioned above, CFD is one way. Bench tests is another. But you should take into account that just a weld may cause the film to separate from the wall.
My experience on these type of distributors is that it is not easy at all (not exactly for a wiped film reactor, but a falling film evaporator in one in one case and a separator with tangencial inlets in another).
- On one case, the distributors had to be modified at least 3 times. Always by the supplier. They finally got it working. But I felt that they were learning with a full scale plant experiment paid by our company. As far as I know, they used CFD but still went thru three iterations until they have it working right.
- In the other case, the internals had to be repaired every time we opened the vessel. Maintenance people kept reinforcing the internals and looking at Process Engineers with that face of "what do we do now?". As far as I know (I don't work in that place now) they still have this problem. Some proposal that the engineering company implemented in other plants included a desing with specially built pieces of pipe (tapered, varying radius and plane curved piping). It was a CFD desing, but with no guarantee, so the decision at the time was wait and see.