Jump to content



Featured Articles

Check out the latest featured articles.

File Library

Check out the latest downloads available in the File Library.

New Article

Product Viscosity vs. Shear

Featured File

Vertical Tank Selection

New Blog Entry

Low Flow in Pipes- posted in Ankur's blog

1

Hysys Tabular Properties & Usage


1 reply to this topic
Share this topic:
| More

#1 IonCube

IonCube

    Veteran Member

  • Members
  • 44 posts

Posted 26 April 2019 - 05:05 PM

Its going to be a long but descriptive post which entails my case study for an x3 effect CaCl2 steam evaporator. Feed of 28w.t% is concentrated to 60w.t%. Properties of CaCl2Brine (not solid) are taken from DIPPR to create an hypo.

I used extended NRTL for every case study with no BIPs info for now

Attached File  pfd.jpg   45.61KB   0 downloads

 

In the Case#1: no modifications were made to the setup. It was realised that Specific Mass Heat Capacity kJ/Kg/K (Cp) of aqueous mixture is predicted very high at different w.t%. In the last column (table pic attached latter) you will see Cp value ranging from 3.8 - 3.3 (from literature it should be b/w 2 - 3).

 

To rectify the over-predicted Cp issue I experimented with Tabular properties.In the Case#2: I did this & it rectified my Cp problem (I DON'T KNOW HOW?). However my Mass Density kg/m^3; got highly under predicted.

Attached File  tabular_case1.jpg   73.87KB   0 downloads

 

From the SimBasis literature; I got this which indicated that physical properties can be adjusted using (what I understood) sort of a fudge factor (Mixing parameter)

Attached File  fudge_.jpg   80.51KB   0 downloads

 

I experimented & a factor of 1.3 gave reasonable results of Mass Density (at different temps & w.t% solutions). This fudge factor will be used to correctly represent density in both Case#2 & #3

Attached File  tabular_case_density_common.jpg   76.72KB   0 downloads

 

Again from the SimBasis literature

Attached File  tabular_req.jpg   67.95KB   0 downloads

 

So in Case#3 I tried changing these parameters (instead of Liq & Gas Enthalpies as in Case#2)

Attached File  tabular_case2.jpg   76.76KB   0 downloads

 

Final results...

Attached File  table.jpg   124.75KB   0 downloads

 

Questions (& observations)

1] A higher steam consumption in #1 is due to higher Cp HYSYS predicted of aqueous solutions? I think yes because each separator T & outlet w.t% are practically similar for all cases

2] Why by just checking default values of Enthalpy(L, G) in #2 reduced Cp (& corrected problem)? Some details are highly appreciable

3] #2 & #3 is one & same thing? For all practical reasons the results are similar

4] Is my labeling of Mixing Parameter a fudge is OK?

5] Is there an alternative to adjust Cp without experimenting with Tabular properties? While creating a Hypo which property highly effects Cp prediction? (by fudging that I willn't go to Tabular properties at all)

 

________

PM me if you need HYSYS case files. It has company info so cannot share publicly


Edited by IonCube, 26 April 2019 - 05:14 PM.


#2 Bobby Strain

Bobby Strain

    Gold Member

  • Members
  • 2,748 posts

Posted 26 April 2019 - 05:28 PM

Did you look for information on the AspenTech support site? Or contact AspenTech? I've always found them helpful.

 

 

Bobby






Similar Topics