Normally, when evaluating inlet and outlet piping losses for PSVs I use a hydraulics software to determine losses for the PSV rated capacity. I am working on a project with limited access to fluid property data. While I should be able to request property values to size the orifice at the relieving pressure, I do not have actual fluid compositions so it is difficult to account for changing conditions along the pipe to evaluate pressure drops for compressible fluids.
It was suggested that I may be able to use standard air to evaluate piping pressure drops. Is it appropriate to use the rated capacity converted to standard air (instead of actual fluid properties) to evaluate pressure drops for a relief system? Although I have seen standard air used in pressure drop calculations for conservation vents, I have not seen this method used for relief valves. Why or why wouldn't this method be appropriate?
ASME Section XIII - Section XIII- Rules for Overpressure Protection includes Mandatory Appendix IV - Capacity Conversion, which gives information on converting rated capacity to a different capacity such as standard air, but this seems aimed at determining whether vendor-certified capacity meets relieving requirements of your fluid. My tendency is to think that this does not work because the fluid properties such as density and viscosity would be different and not give the same pressure drops as the equivalent flow of air. In addition, it would not address possible condensing as pressure drops through the piping.
Thoughts?
Thanks,
Shara