Jump to content



Featured Articles

Check out the latest featured articles.

File Library

Check out the latest downloads available in the File Library.

New Article

Product Viscosity vs. Shear

Featured File

Vertical Tank Selection

New Blog Entry

Low Flow in Pipes- posted in Ankur's blog

4

Hysys Separator Carryover Setup And Phase Envelope

hysys phase envelope carryover

5 replies to this topic
Share this topic:
| More

#1 powerox29

powerox29

    Brand New Member

  • Members
  • 5 posts

Posted 05 January 2026 - 09:10 PM

Hi all,

 

I've been tasked to determine why there is damage to the reciprocating compressor which is downstream of a suction scrubber and its cooler. Recent boroscope findings determine that the vane pack and internals of the scrubber are clean (no damage).

 

I have modeled the simulation via HYSYS and by using the separator carryover setup (with various assumptions), I've found that there is indeed no liquid carryover immediately at the scrubber gas outlet, however from observing the phase envelope the scrubber is actually operating in the two-phase region, hence there is condensation occurring downstream and probably within the scrubber as well.

 

I'd like any opinions on how to mitigate this. Would applying heat tracing at the gas outlet solve this? Or is replacing the coolers into a heater work?



#2 Pilesar

Pilesar

    Gold Member

  • Admin
  • 1,609 posts

Posted 05 January 2026 - 11:23 PM

If there is no gas-liquid separator at the compressor, then I would consider installing one. Or improve the one you have.



#3 powerox29

powerox29

    Brand New Member

  • Members
  • 5 posts

Posted Yesterday, 12:01 AM

If there is no gas-liquid separator at the compressor, then I would consider installing one. Or improve the one you have.

As mentioned, there is a scrubber at the compressor suction.



#4 breizh

breizh

    Gold Member

  • Admin
  • 6,887 posts

Posted Yesterday, 01:24 AM

Hi,

How will you be sure there is no liquid carried over? Simulation is just a tool! 

A separator will mitigate risk and prevent trouble coming from the scrubber (mist eliminator, spray nozzles damaged for example).

Continuous monitoring pressure and temperature at the outlet of the scrubber should help.

my view 

Breizh



#5 powerox29

powerox29

    Brand New Member

  • Members
  • 5 posts

Posted Yesterday, 02:31 AM

Agreed.

 

However, if there were liquid carryover wouldnt there be signs on the internals of the scrubber? As I've mentioned, borescope findings from inspection team conclude that there are no visible damage to the vane pack. If there were liquid carryover, I would expect some signs on the internals i.e. fouling etc.

 

 

Hi,

How will you be sure there is no liquid carried over? Simulation is just a tool! 

A separator will mitigate risk and prevent trouble coming from the scrubber (mist eliminator, spray nozzles damaged for example).

Continuous monitoring pressure and temperature at the outlet of the scrubber should help.

my view 

Breizh



#6 Alpe

Alpe

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • 15 posts

Posted Yesterday, 11:52 AM

a gas / liquid separator before the compressor is a common arrangement to protect the equipment from wet gas / liquid / slugging / Hc foaming etc...

it is not clear if existing scrubber has high-level alarms / emergency shutdown system etc...

 

about simulation,  after a scrubber (with some liquid inside) probably you are compressing a saturated or near-dew-point gas...

if you know the exact composition you can calculate the dew point... you don't mention the fluid, for hydrocarbons a EOS such as Peng-Robinson or Soave can be accurate to 1-2 C. for different chemicals make sure to use the correct thermo... 

I use  different tools ( Prode / Excel / Python to simulate real separators)  so I can't comment your results.

 






Similar Topics