Jump to content



Featured Articles

Check out the latest featured articles.

File Library

Check out the latest downloads available in the File Library.

New Article

Product Viscosity vs. Shear

Featured File

Vertical Tank Selection

New Blog Entry

Low Flow in Pipes- posted in Ankur's blog

Optimal Pressure Drop - Plate Heat Exchanger


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
2 replies to this topic
Share this topic:
| More

#1 Sadananda Konchady

Sadananda Konchady

    Gold Member

  • Members
  • 63 posts

Posted 04 January 2007 - 01:35 AM

This is about the pressure drop specification for a plate heat exchanger application required in our process. Would allowable pressure drop of 0.5 bar be appropriate or should it be 0.8 bar?

In Plate Heat Exchanger application as a user, what is the optimal pressure drop specification for a case with almost equal flow of good quality water on both sides and temperature change (only sensible heat transfer) on both sides. Relatively, there seems to be a substantial pressure drop used up in the inlet and outlet nozzles, besides the pressure drop effectively used through the channels used in actual heat transfer. The flow conditions are as follows --

Hot water / Cold water

Water flow, kg/s 600 600

Temperature In, deg. C 130 120

Temperature Out, deg. C 125 125

Fouling factor may be considered as practically zero.

Thank you for your comments.

#2 palusa

palusa

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • 24 posts

Posted 05 January 2007 - 06:17 AM

Normally PHE's pressure drops are determined by the flow through plate channels.
Within the plate, the friction factors are in general much higher than those inside a tube for the same Reynolds number. However, nominal velocities are low and plate lengths limited, so that the term v2L/2g in the pressure drop equation is much smaller than those normally encountered in tubulars.
The friction factor is correlated with:
ΔP =f ρ v2L/2g ; f = B/Rey
where y varies from 0.1 to 0.4 in turbulence and B is a constant characteristic of the plate.

In the specific, your PHE looks pretty big (duty ca. 12MW) ... I estimated 0.9 bar pressure drops (0.2 through ports + 0.7 through channels) so I suggest to verify if your system can allow for at least 1 bar pressure drops.

Hope this can help.

_Lf

#3 Sadananda Konchady

Sadananda Konchady

    Gold Member

  • Members
  • 63 posts

Posted 11 January 2007 - 05:59 AM

Thanks, Palusa for the suggestion to increase the permissible pressure drop to 1 bar. There must be an optimum from the customer's view point since the pumping power required would also increase as the permissible pressure drop is increased.
I will check this further when floating enquiries to PHE vendors.

Regards,,

Escape


QUOTE (palusa @ Jan 5 2007, 06:17 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Normally PHE's pressure drops are determined by the flow through plate channels.
Within the plate, the friction factors are in general much higher than those inside a tube for the same Reynolds number. However, nominal velocities are low and plate lengths limited, so that the term v2L/2g in the pressure drop equation is much smaller than those normally encountered in tubulars.
The friction factor is correlated with:
ΔP =f ρ v2L/2g ; f = B/Rey
where y varies from 0.1 to 0.4 in turbulence and B is a constant characteristic of the plate.

In the specific, your PHE looks pretty big (duty ca. 12MW) ... I estimated 0.9 bar pressure drops (0.2 through ports + 0.7 through channels) so I suggest to verify if your system can allow for at least 1 bar pressure drops.

Hope this can help.

_Lf





Similar Topics