Jump to content



Featured Articles

Check out the latest featured articles.

File Library

Check out the latest downloads available in the File Library.

New Article

Product Viscosity vs. Shear

Featured File

Vertical Tank Selection

New Blog Entry

Low Flow in Pipes- posted in Ankur's blog

Pump Around Pumps


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
7 replies to this topic
Share this topic:
| More

#1 Ritesh Suratwala

Ritesh Suratwala

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • 17 posts

Posted 19 January 2007 - 12:32 PM

Hi all,

In distillation column, pump around is used to condense vapor inside column by exchanging

heat with other process stream (mainly feed stream). Liquid is drawn from column tray

through pump, passes through heat exchanger where it exchanges heat with other process

stream and cooled liquid is returned back to column.

I have a question related to control system for pump around loop and safety of pump around

pumps.

In any pump, trip is provided to protect pump in case of low level in suction vessel.

However, in case of pump around pumps, liquid is drawn from tray. Do we require any level

instruments and trip from column tray liquid to protect pumps? In case yes, how to take care

hold-up requirement of tray and what is typical hold up time required?

I have seen many systems where no low level trip / level instrument is provided in column at

draw tray to protect pump around pumps, however pumps are system is running without any

trouble. I have one example where plant is almost 30 years old and do now have any

protection for pump around pumps, eventhough those are very big (HT motor) pumps.
Is it because pump is circulating liquid and there is no probability of drop in liquid level?

I am not able to conclude. Can anyone give me more clarification on pump around system and

instrumentation required specially for pump around pumps?

#2 Milutin

Milutin

    Veteran Member

  • Members
  • 47 posts

Posted 19 January 2007 - 05:31 PM

In our refinery we have two crude units. Older unit have active tray (ordinary valve tray with draw off sump) for drawing LGO pumparaund and LGO product. It doesn’t have any protection for pumparaund pump.
New unit have collector tray (chimney tray) with liquid overflow. That tray have level indicator.
In my opinion collector tray is better choice because if you see level going down you can cut back LGO product flow and keep level on that tray, and in that way protect pumaraund pump. We don’t have any other protection for PA pump.
On case with active tray it is much easier to lost level on tray.

Regards,

Milutin

#3 Ritesh Suratwala

Ritesh Suratwala

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • 17 posts

Posted 19 January 2007 - 08:38 PM

Hi Milutin,

Thanks for reply.

Still I am not sure how this types of tray going to make any difference? According to me, it is all about hold-up time in tray. Can you give more details if you have?

Also, since liquid is being circulated in close loop, what could be possible reasons for loss of liquid in pump draw-off tray?

In any case, direct trip to pump for protection is not given. Is it accepted practice? I would like to know if some one has real experience regarding troubles / failure of pump around pumps.

Thanks.

#4 Milutin

Milutin

    Veteran Member

  • Members
  • 47 posts

Posted 20 January 2007 - 01:25 AM

You are right it is all about hold-up time on tray, time to cope with upsets. Active tray have short residence time, on that tray you have only level above outlet weir which is (depending of design) few centimeters high and in addition height of tray sump. On chimney tray outlet weir is much higher and quantity of liquid is larger. Also on chimney tray we have level indicator which really helps.
Typical residence time is from 3-7 minutes, in our case 4 minutes.

You can loss level on PA tray when you dry off that tray for that can be numerous reasons: unit upset, different crude switch, attempt to draw more product from that tray then possible, etc.

In some new designs I saw also pump protection, when pump lost discharge pressure, pump trip.

Regards,

Milutin

#5 palusa

palusa

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • 24 posts

Posted 22 January 2007 - 10:49 AM

My experience:

pumparound drawn-off from single chimney-tray having 3-4 min hold up; external standpipe for holding tray level transmitters and switches.
Pumparound is under level control throttling a LCV on pump discharge line.
Pumps protection is made through Lo/Hi levels switches on tray standpipe that trip/change-over the pump. (Normally pumps are grade located so they have large NPSH av.).
On pump dicharge line minimum flow (with separate FCV) recycle to the chimney tray.

Rgds.

_Lf_

#6 Zauberberg

Zauberberg

    Gold Member

  • ChE Plus Subscriber
  • 2,727 posts

Posted 23 January 2007 - 10:34 AM

One of the keys of succesful and smooth operation of pumparound loops, is to provide sufficient liquid residence time on the draw-off tray, for the purpose of liquid degassing. Employing chimney trays with recessed sumps is a standard design practice during last several decades. On the other side, active trays do not provide enough time for liquid degassing (I do not know about the newest designs); in such circumstances, the pumparound exit nozzle cavitation occurs and pumparound flow is greatly reduced - regardless of the liquid level on the draw-off tray. This adversely affects column heat balance and unit operation.

The optimum configuration is to draw the product from the same tray as for the pumparound stream - this minimizes startup, shutdown and feed-switching upsets in column operation.

To protect P/A or other high head/high flow pumps from loosing the liquid flow, suction pressure control can be employed. And if properly designed, it works very well.

#7 Milutin

Milutin

    Veteran Member

  • Members
  • 47 posts

Posted 23 January 2007 - 03:01 PM

Palusa you mentioned:

QUOTE (palusa @ Jan 22 2007, 10:49 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Pumparound is under level control throttling a LCV on pump discharge line.


Is this LCV on product (to storage) line? It looks like control arrangement on vacuum distillation unit or FCCU main fractionator.

Regards,

Milutin

#8 palusa

palusa

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • 24 posts

Posted 24 January 2007 - 04:53 AM

Milutin,
you are right: what i described is the side arrangement of a fractionating column.

Regards.

_Lf_




Similar Topics