I have a probably delicate problem (or it's my thought only?) about calculating the vent capacity of floating roof tanks.
As we all know, API 2000 does not state or distinguish basis of calculation for either fixed-roof or floating roof tanks. In many case studies, fixed-roof is used, not floating roof, so I don't have any similar information.
Technically speaking, based on API 2000, I think only thermal case should be considered. Liquid pumping in/out is probably does not need to be accounted for since the liquid surface will create bouyancy at the roof (bouyance force negated by weight of roof, creating zero force resultant).
Again, in my opinion:
-----
The difference between effect of pumping at fixed-roof and floating roof is the accumulated pressure (let's assume pressure side only) when the liquid is being filled in.
In fixed-roof tanks, the accumulated pressure shall be instantly vented to prevent (at extreme) deformation of roof. While in floating roof tanks, the accumulated pressure can be 'stored' (in other words does not be vented instantly like in fixed-roofs), then create 'bouyancy' and when reaches set pressure, vented immediately.
Easily, fixed-roofs can not cope more pressure accumulation than floating-roofs. So I think the design of floating-roofs has some amount of 'margin'. On the other hand, this 'margin' is used to compensate extremely large capacity of venting (if calculated by thermal + liquid displacement as per API 2000). Imagine, for example, floating-roof crude tanks with capacity of more than 500,000 barrels, operating at extreme temperature, say like in the desert.
-----
I would like to share thoughts for this case.
I'm sorry if my description above confuses you

I really am a junior process engineer and have great interests in relief / safety.
Thank you
PS:
I've already described the problem here