Gentlemen,
I would like your comments(s) on tailpipe design for boiler relief valves. In my case I have two relief valves set at 735 psig and 750 psig mounted directly on the boiler steam drum. I would llike to keep the tailpipes short but the platform for accessing the stack EPA nozzles is almost directly above the relief valves (about 25 feet above). I believe I need the tailpipe discharge to be 10 feet above the EPA platform and this involves a fairly lengthy tailpipe. Any suggestions on sizing the tailpipe with regard to sonic velocity?
Thanks
|

Boiler Psv Vent Piping
Started by Guest_D. Roy_*, Oct 20 2004 12:23 PM
2 replies to this topic
Share this topic:
#1
Guest_D. Roy_*
Posted 20 October 2004 - 12:23 PM
#2
Posted 21 October 2004 - 12:19 AM
Roy,
Excellent question. You are right in locating the tailpipe vent away from any platform, which an operator can access.
Sizing the tailpipe to ensure that the allowable back pressure is not exceeded is required. Sizing for compressible flow at high velocities is not as straightforward as is often believed.
First, it has to be evaluated if the flow will be sonic. I believe it will be. The following arguement then holds for flow through conduits of constant cross section:
Flow through pipes in a typical plant where line lengths are short or the pipe is well insulated can be considered adiabatic. A typical situation is a pipe into which gas enters at a given pressure and temperature and flows at a rate determined by the length and diameter of the pipe and downstream pressure. As the line gets longer friction losses increase and the following occurs:
a) Pressure decreases
Density decreases
c) Velocity increases
d) Enthalpy decreases
e) Entropy increases
The question is “ will the velocity keep on increasing till it crosses the sonic barrier?” The answer is NO. The maximum velocity always occurs at the end of the pipe and keeps on increasing as the pressure drops till it reaches Mach 1. The velocity cannot cross the sonic barrier in adiabatic flow through a conduit of constant cross section. If an effort is made to decrease downstream pressure further the velocity, pressure, temperature and density remains constant at the end of the pipe corresponding to Mach 1 conditions. The excess pressure drop is dissipated by shock waves at the pipe exit due to sudden expansion. If the line length is increased to drop the pressure further the mass flux decreases so that Mach 1 is maintained at the end of the pipe.
The above is important to appreciate. After you have established that sonic exists by calculating the critical pressure,
[ ( k + 1 ) / 2 ] k / ( k - 1 )
then the next step is to calculate the pressure drop through the line. The formula for this is given in McCabe and Smith or Shapiro. I would have copied that formula here, but this website does not allow pasting of Micrsoft equations.
( Admistrators help!). The file containing this formula is attached. Look at the text book for explanation of terms, and the solution is pretty starightforward, with the unknown being the length of the pipe required to flow a given mass of fluid. In case the flow is sub-sonic the same equation holds, but the solution is now iterative.
Word of caution:-This equation is for adibatic flow of ideal gas in constant diameter pipes.
Milton's website www.air-dispersion.com is also an excellent source to understand compressible flow. However I believe the site does not contain flow through a conduit. ( I could be wrong- Milton ?)
I hope the above helps.
Regards
Excellent question. You are right in locating the tailpipe vent away from any platform, which an operator can access.
Sizing the tailpipe to ensure that the allowable back pressure is not exceeded is required. Sizing for compressible flow at high velocities is not as straightforward as is often believed.
First, it has to be evaluated if the flow will be sonic. I believe it will be. The following arguement then holds for flow through conduits of constant cross section:
Flow through pipes in a typical plant where line lengths are short or the pipe is well insulated can be considered adiabatic. A typical situation is a pipe into which gas enters at a given pressure and temperature and flows at a rate determined by the length and diameter of the pipe and downstream pressure. As the line gets longer friction losses increase and the following occurs:
a) Pressure decreases

c) Velocity increases
d) Enthalpy decreases
e) Entropy increases
The question is “ will the velocity keep on increasing till it crosses the sonic barrier?” The answer is NO. The maximum velocity always occurs at the end of the pipe and keeps on increasing as the pressure drops till it reaches Mach 1. The velocity cannot cross the sonic barrier in adiabatic flow through a conduit of constant cross section. If an effort is made to decrease downstream pressure further the velocity, pressure, temperature and density remains constant at the end of the pipe corresponding to Mach 1 conditions. The excess pressure drop is dissipated by shock waves at the pipe exit due to sudden expansion. If the line length is increased to drop the pressure further the mass flux decreases so that Mach 1 is maintained at the end of the pipe.
The above is important to appreciate. After you have established that sonic exists by calculating the critical pressure,
[ ( k + 1 ) / 2 ] k / ( k - 1 )
then the next step is to calculate the pressure drop through the line. The formula for this is given in McCabe and Smith or Shapiro. I would have copied that formula here, but this website does not allow pasting of Micrsoft equations.
( Admistrators help!). The file containing this formula is attached. Look at the text book for explanation of terms, and the solution is pretty starightforward, with the unknown being the length of the pipe required to flow a given mass of fluid. In case the flow is sub-sonic the same equation holds, but the solution is now iterative.
Word of caution:-This equation is for adibatic flow of ideal gas in constant diameter pipes.
Milton's website www.air-dispersion.com is also an excellent source to understand compressible flow. However I believe the site does not contain flow through a conduit. ( I could be wrong- Milton ?)
I hope the above helps.
Regards
Attached Files
#3
Guest_D. Roy_*
Posted 21 October 2004 - 02:32 PM
Rajiv,
Thanks for your suggestions. I am proceeding on the basis of staying below sonic velocity at the tailpipe outlet.
Thanks for your suggestions. I am proceeding on the basis of staying below sonic velocity at the tailpipe outlet.
Similar Topics
Improving Safety By Re-Routing Priming Vent Line In Centrifugal Pump HStarted by Guest_Srinivas Agastheeswaran_* , 31 Jan 2025 |
|
![]() |
||
Psv On Ko Drum With Flame Arrestor At Flare Vent LineStarted by Guest_Tintin2024_* , 29 Oct 2024 |
|
![]() |
||
Effect Of Continuous Blow Down To Boiler Feed WaterStarted by Guest_Dyames027_* , 21 Nov 2024 |
|
![]() |
||
Minimum Vapor Disengagement Area For A Kettle BoilerStarted by Guest_Engib33r_* , 17 Oct 2024 |
|
![]() |
||
Maximum Velocity For Piping In Fire Water Distribution System (Fire WaStarted by Guest_applepe_* , 06 Sep 2024 |
|
![]() |