Latest Downloads
-
Water Bath Indirect Heaters
Art Montemayor - Oct 12 2018 02:35 PM
-
Petroleum: A Primer for Kansas
Art Montemayor - Oct 12 2018 02:27 PM
-
Spray Tower for Flue Gas Scrubbing Design
ankur2061 - May 02 2018 02:31 PM
-
Selection of Vertical Tanks
ankur2061 - Apr 19 2018 07:42 AM
-
Pressure Drop Calculator for Strainers 1
ankur2061 - Mar 24 2017 02:04 PM
-
Horizontal Pig Trap System Design Guidelines
ankur2061 - Jan 14 2017 02:54 PM
-
Performance Prediction of 3-Stage Propane Refrigeration System
ankur2061 - Aug 08 2016 02:43 PM
-
Centrifugal Pump Troubleshooting Checklist
ankur2061 - Dec 17 2015 08:18 AM
-
Compressor Troubleshooting Checklist
ankur2061 - Sep 08 2015 11:43 AM
-
Amine Sweetening Unit Preliminary Design
ankur2061 - May 19 2015 09:35 AM
Popular Store Titles
Tank Jacket Calculator
Specification Sheet Collection
PIPESIZE
Relief Valve Sizing
Rupture Disc Sizing
Chemical and Process Engineering Resources
Submitted Chris Haslego, Nov 21 2011 11:21 AM | Last updated Nov 21 2011 01:29 PM
Category: | Equipment Design |
Question: | If the incorrect design pressure was stamped on a shell and tube heat exchanger by the fabricator, is it necessary to repeat the hydrotest to have the nameplate corrected? |
Keywords: | v1i10,shell,tube,heat,exchanger,rating,rerating,wrong,design,pressure,asme |
Answer: | BACKGROUNDThe heat exchanger in this case was stamped for 115 psig/FV on the tube side and 150 psig/FV on the shell side. The unit was tested at 195 psig on both sides by the fabricator (which corresponds to the required 1.3 times design pressure needed for ASME code). The 115 psig rating the tubes was in error and it should have been stamped for 150 psig/FV as requested by the buyer and per the testing pressure that was actually used in the shop. This heat exchanger has never been in service.ANSWERThe fabricator in this case is most likely protecting their interest. The have two pieces of information (the name plate design pressure for the tubeside and the hydrotest datasheet for the tubeside). In this case, for them to simply restamp the unit, they would have to be 100% certain that the mistake was made on the nameplate and not of the testing report. ASME Code section U-2 and UG-90 will help with this topic, however, this is a matter of safety and procedure. There's most likely no way to know for absolute certain that the tubes were tested at 195 psig with the conflicting nameplate. It would prudent course to allow the fabricator to retest and then restamp the unit. This will ensure the safety of the personnel responsible for working near this unit. Additional, it may be good idea to audit the fabricators quality system if you're to continue to conduct business with them as this is a mistake that should not happen again.Reference: Mr. Phil Leckner, First Content Manager, CERP |
Forum Quick Links
Tech Q & A Category List
-
Bulk Solids
-
ChE Outside the Plant
-
Chemical Process Business
-
Chemistry Basics
-
Corrosion
-
Equipment Design
-
Experimentation and Testing
-
Fluid Dynamics
-
Heat Transfer Technology
-
Industrial Utilities
-
Mass Transfer
-
Physical Property Information
-
Plant Basics
-
Plant Economics
-
Preparing to Become an Engineer
-
Process Control
-
Reactions and Processes
-
Refining
-
Safety
-
Separation Technology
-
The Environment
-
Thermodynamics
0 Comments