Latest Downloads
-
Water Bath Indirect Heaters
Art Montemayor - Oct 12 2018 02:35 PM
-
Petroleum: A Primer for Kansas
Art Montemayor - Oct 12 2018 02:27 PM
-
Spray Tower for Flue Gas Scrubbing Design
ankur2061 - May 02 2018 02:31 PM
-
Selection of Vertical Tanks
ankur2061 - Apr 19 2018 07:42 AM
-
Pressure Drop Calculator for Strainers 1
ankur2061 - Mar 24 2017 02:04 PM
-
Horizontal Pig Trap System Design Guidelines
ankur2061 - Jan 14 2017 02:54 PM
-
Performance Prediction of 3-Stage Propane Refrigeration System
ankur2061 - Aug 08 2016 02:43 PM
-
Centrifugal Pump Troubleshooting Checklist
ankur2061 - Dec 17 2015 08:18 AM
-
Compressor Troubleshooting Checklist
ankur2061 - Sep 08 2015 11:43 AM
-
Amine Sweetening Unit Preliminary Design
ankur2061 - May 19 2015 09:35 AM
Popular Store Titles
Tank Jacket Calculator
Specification Sheet Collection
PIPESIZE
Relief Valve Sizing
Rupture Disc Sizing
Chemical and Process Engineering Resources
Submitted Chris Haslego, Nov 21 2011 11:21 AM | Last updated Nov 21 2011 01:29 PM
Category: | Refining |
Question: | What could be a possible cause for 35% Nitrogen being in our FCC dry gas? |
Keywords: | nitrogen,dry,gas,fluidized,catalytic,cracker,fcc |
Answer: | There will always be some nitrogen in the dry gas. Your primary source is the N2 that is entrained in the catalyst from the Regenerator. Specific ratios will vary, based on catalyst circulation rates and moles of dry gas produced. 35% is on the high side. The first thing I would check is the possibility of air contamination of the sample. Once that possibility is eliminated, I would look for other areas where air or nitrogen might be getting into the system. For example, bleeds and purges in the FCC reactor system. Some units use air for instrument bleeds. Some also use air to fluidize regenerated catalyst standpipes. If either air or nitrogen is used in any of these services, I would make sure that all of the restriction orifices are in place. Finally, I would check to make sure that the design of the regenerator air distributor and spent catalyst withdrawal system is not causing air/flue gas entrainment into the spend catalyst standpipe. Have these high nitrogen levels occurred recently, or are these typical values for your unit? Have you made any modifications recently that would be expected to lower the dry gas yield (for example, an improved riser termination device or better feed nozzles). These same modifications would also be expected to increase the catalyst circulation and this would increase the amount of nitrogen entrained from the regenerator. The combination of lower dry gas and increased entrainment would be expected to raise the nitrogen level in the dry gas. |
Forum Quick Links
Tech Q & A Category List
-
Bulk Solids
-
ChE Outside the Plant
-
Chemical Process Business
-
Chemistry Basics
-
Corrosion
-
Equipment Design
-
Experimentation and Testing
-
Fluid Dynamics
-
Heat Transfer Technology
-
Industrial Utilities
-
Mass Transfer
-
Physical Property Information
-
Plant Basics
-
Plant Economics
-
Preparing to Become an Engineer
-
Process Control
-
Reactions and Processes
-
Refining
-
Safety
-
Separation Technology
-
The Environment
-
Thermodynamics
0 Comments