Latest Downloads
-
Water Bath Indirect Heaters
Art Montemayor - Oct 12 2018 02:35 PM
-
Petroleum: A Primer for Kansas
Art Montemayor - Oct 12 2018 02:27 PM
-
Spray Tower for Flue Gas Scrubbing Design
ankur2061 - May 02 2018 02:31 PM
-
Selection of Vertical Tanks
ankur2061 - Apr 19 2018 07:42 AM
-
Pressure Drop Calculator for Strainers 1
ankur2061 - Mar 24 2017 02:04 PM
-
Horizontal Pig Trap System Design Guidelines
ankur2061 - Jan 14 2017 02:54 PM
-
Performance Prediction of 3-Stage Propane Refrigeration System
ankur2061 - Aug 08 2016 02:43 PM
-
Centrifugal Pump Troubleshooting Checklist
ankur2061 - Dec 17 2015 08:18 AM
-
Compressor Troubleshooting Checklist
ankur2061 - Sep 08 2015 11:43 AM
-
Amine Sweetening Unit Preliminary Design
ankur2061 - May 19 2015 09:35 AM
Popular Store Titles
Tank Jacket Calculator
Specification Sheet Collection
PIPESIZE
Relief Valve Sizing
Rupture Disc Sizing
Chemical and Process Engineering Resources
Submitted Chris Haslego, Nov 21 2011 11:21 AM | Last updated Nov 21 2011 01:29 PM
Category: | Safety |
Question: | What is the procedure for considering a relief valve on the tubeside of a shell and tube heat exchanger? |
Keywords: | relief,valve,tube,tubeside,shell,heat,exchanger,rupture |
Answer: | BACKGROUNDFor a heat exchanger with the following characteristics:shell side: hydrocarbon stream 35000 Lb/hr @ 350 psitube side: steam flow 37000 Lb/hr @ 70psig. A relief valve should be installed in case of tube rupture and guidance is required.ANSWERYou must first find out what the design pressure of the two sides are. You should be able to determine this from the name plate on the heat exchanger. Assuming that the equipment has been hydrotested for at least 150% of design pressure, then if the design pressure of the high pressure side (your shell) is more than 2/3 of the design pressure of your low pressure side (your tubes), then you must consider tube rupture as a credible relief scenario. If the design pressures are within 2/3, then you do not. Note that I am talking about design pressures and not operating pressures.The assumption by API RP521 is that tubes seldom fail or rupture catastrophically but spring small leaks. These leaks seldom overpressure the low pressure side of the exchanger during operation.Recommended practices (API) stipulates that you do not only look at the design pressure of the heat exchanger but also of the attached upstream and downstream equipment. I would assume that downstream of the exchanger tube side is some condensate collection tank. For you to NOT consider a tube rupture scenario, the condensate collection tank must also have a design pressure that is within 2/3 of the shell side design pressure. If not, then at the time it's relief valve was sized, the tube rupture scenario must have been taken into account. If it wasn't, then it is in violation (assuming it has a relief valve of course).Source: Philip Leckner, First Content Manager |
Forum Quick Links
Tech Q & A Category List
-
Bulk Solids
-
ChE Outside the Plant
-
Chemical Process Business
-
Chemistry Basics
-
Corrosion
-
Equipment Design
-
Experimentation and Testing
-
Fluid Dynamics
-
Heat Transfer Technology
-
Industrial Utilities
-
Mass Transfer
-
Physical Property Information
-
Plant Basics
-
Plant Economics
-
Preparing to Become an Engineer
-
Process Control
-
Reactions and Processes
-
Refining
-
Safety
-
Separation Technology
-
The Environment
-
Thermodynamics
0 Comments