Hello All,
What are the advantages of having inlet nozzle on top of the caustic storage tank. Are there any codes that I should consider before designing the caustic storage tanks.
Thanks.
|

Inlet Nozzle For Caustic Storage Tank
Started by Chemical9, Jul 08 2010 06:44 PM
6 replies to this topic
Share this topic:
#1
Posted 08 July 2010 - 06:44 PM
#2
Posted 08 July 2010 - 07:00 PM
Hi Chemical9 ,
Let you consider this paper from Dow chemical ,it should support your query .
http://www.dow.com/c...fety/design.htm
Hope this helps
Breizh
Let you consider this paper from Dow chemical ,it should support your query .
http://www.dow.com/c...fety/design.htm
Hope this helps
Breizh
#3
Posted 09 July 2010 - 10:53 AM
Breizh,
Thanks for the response. I saw that website earlier and wondering what happens if we have inlet nozzle on the bottom of the tank with some kind of check valves.
Thanks for the response. I saw that website earlier and wondering what happens if we have inlet nozzle on the bottom of the tank with some kind of check valves.
#4
Posted 09 July 2010 - 12:45 PM
Chemical9:
Having dealt with and stored a lot of hazardous chemcicals - including caustic soda - I have always preferred to have - where possible - 100% roof mounted nozzles on storage tanks. The reason(s) for this is that the possibility of human contact - or liquid spillage - are essentially avoided. The only thing left to allow for liquid spillage is a main tank rupture - which is deemed not credible if one has yearly tank inspections and dikes. Of course, I have met a lot of management disapproval in the past due to the extra costs - but my response is that serious safety measures always cost extra money.
In the Dow design I suspect that they are avoiding a potential back-syphoning of caustic after terminating the tank loading or filling. With a dip pipe they have to drill a syphon-breaking hole at the top of the dip pipe, immediately under the fixed roof. I usually used a 1/2" drill to do this.
You don't state the reason for your installing a check valve on the fill line, but I suspect that you are also concerned with a back-flow. I would point out that a check valve will not "fly" in a Hazop review and, therefore, will not be accepted as a mitigation of caustic back flow. And that may well be the reason that Dow opts for top entry. That would be my guess.
#5
Posted 09 July 2010 - 01:12 PM
Art,
I appreciate you for sharing your valuable experience. I thought of using check valve to avoid back-flow. Is it a common practice to use dip pipe inside a chemical storage tanks.
Thanks,
I appreciate you for sharing your valuable experience. I thought of using check valve to avoid back-flow. Is it a common practice to use dip pipe inside a chemical storage tanks.
Thanks,
#6
Posted 09 July 2010 - 01:25 PM
I consider the application of top entry for tank filling as essentially a "standard operating procedure" (SOP). When I worked on DuPont and Huntsman plant projects, it was basically 100% of the storage tank filling operations - and in the Dupont projects we always had a dip pipe (with a weep hole) to avoid any generation of static electricity due to liquid hydrocarbons' free-falling.
#7
Posted 09 July 2010 - 02:43 PM
Thank you very much for the information. Are there any codes that we should consider before designing storage tanks.
Similar Topics
Is Emergency Venting Required For Polyethylene Storage Tank In Fire ScStarted by Guest_chem55_* , Yesterday, 03:06 PM |
|
![]() |
||
![]() Relief Path To Be Considered For Inlet Pressure Drop CalculationStarted by Guest_Ascanio E._* , 09 Jul 2025 |
|
![]() |
||
![]() Free Vent For Api 650 Tank - Bug Screen / Bird Screen RequirementStarted by Guest_Cabbarbeybaba_* , 03 Jul 2025 |
|
![]() |
||
![]() ![]() Nozzle Sizing CalculationStarted by Guest_BabRafiq1_* , 26 Aug 2022 |
|
![]() |
||
![]() Steam Sparger In Atmospheric Water TankStarted by Guest_owe_* , 16 May 2025 |
|
![]() |