Jump to content



Featured Articles

Check out the latest featured articles.

File Library

Check out the latest downloads available in the File Library.

New Article

Product Viscosity vs. Shear

Featured File

Vertical Tank Selection

New Blog Entry

Low Flow in Pipes- posted in Ankur's blog

Inlet Nozzle For Caustic Storage Tank


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
6 replies to this topic
Share this topic:
| More

#1 Chemical9

Chemical9

    Junior Member

  • ChE Plus Subscriber
  • 13 posts

Posted 08 July 2010 - 06:44 PM

Hello All,

What are the advantages of having inlet nozzle on top of the caustic storage tank. Are there any codes that I should consider before designing the caustic storage tanks.

Thanks.

#2 breizh

breizh

    Gold Member

  • Admin
  • 6,718 posts

Posted 08 July 2010 - 07:00 PM

Hi Chemical9 ,
Let you consider this paper from Dow chemical ,it should support your query .

http://www.dow.com/c...fety/design.htm


Hope this helps

Breizh

#3 Chemical9

Chemical9

    Junior Member

  • ChE Plus Subscriber
  • 13 posts

Posted 09 July 2010 - 10:53 AM

Breizh,

Thanks for the response. I saw that website earlier and wondering what happens if we have inlet nozzle on the bottom of the tank with some kind of check valves.

#4 Art Montemayor

Art Montemayor

    Gold Member

  • Admin
  • 5,782 posts

Posted 09 July 2010 - 12:45 PM



Chemical9:

Having dealt with and stored a lot of hazardous chemcicals - including caustic soda - I have always preferred to have - where possible - 100% roof mounted nozzles on storage tanks. The reason(s) for this is that the possibility of human contact - or liquid spillage - are essentially avoided. The only thing left to allow for liquid spillage is a main tank rupture - which is deemed not credible if one has yearly tank inspections and dikes. Of course, I have met a lot of management disapproval in the past due to the extra costs - but my response is that serious safety measures always cost extra money.

In the Dow design I suspect that they are avoiding a potential back-syphoning of caustic after terminating the tank loading or filling. With a dip pipe they have to drill a syphon-breaking hole at the top of the dip pipe, immediately under the fixed roof. I usually used a 1/2" drill to do this.

You don't state the reason for your installing a check valve on the fill line, but I suspect that you are also concerned with a back-flow. I would point out that a check valve will not "fly" in a Hazop review and, therefore, will not be accepted as a mitigation of caustic back flow. And that may well be the reason that Dow opts for top entry. That would be my guess.


#5 Chemical9

Chemical9

    Junior Member

  • ChE Plus Subscriber
  • 13 posts

Posted 09 July 2010 - 01:12 PM

Art,

I appreciate you for sharing your valuable experience. I thought of using check valve to avoid back-flow. Is it a common practice to use dip pipe inside a chemical storage tanks.

Thanks,

#6 Art Montemayor

Art Montemayor

    Gold Member

  • Admin
  • 5,782 posts

Posted 09 July 2010 - 01:25 PM



I consider the application of top entry for tank filling as essentially a "standard operating procedure" (SOP). When I worked on DuPont and Huntsman plant projects, it was basically 100% of the storage tank filling operations - and in the Dupont projects we always had a dip pipe (with a weep hole) to avoid any generation of static electricity due to liquid hydrocarbons' free-falling.


#7 Chemical9

Chemical9

    Junior Member

  • ChE Plus Subscriber
  • 13 posts

Posted 09 July 2010 - 02:43 PM

Thank you very much for the information. Are there any codes that we should consider before designing storage tanks.




Similar Topics