Jump to content



Featured Articles

Check out the latest featured articles.

File Library

Check out the latest downloads available in the File Library.

New Article

Product Viscosity vs. Shear

Featured File

Vertical Tank Selection

New Blog Entry

Low Flow in Pipes- posted in Ankur's blog

Cryogenic Expanders


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
5 replies to this topic
Share this topic:
| More

#1 singh ar

singh ar

    Brand New Member

  • Members
  • 2 posts

Posted 22 August 2010 - 06:24 AM

Can anyone help me how to find out the efficiency of cryogenic turbines or cryogenic expanders ?

Edited by singh ar, 23 August 2010 - 03:11 AM.


#2 Zauberberg

Zauberberg

    Gold Member

  • ChE Plus Subscriber
  • 2,728 posts

Posted 22 August 2010 - 06:58 AM

For actual efficiency of any machine, you should refer to the vendor performance/efficiency curves. Turboexpander efficiencies range from 60-85% (source: J.Campbell). For preliminary design purposes, a figure between 70-75% is a reasonable estimate.

If you are interested in the efficiency estimation/calculation procedure, please refer to the Campbell's "Gas Conditioning and Processing Vol.3 - Advanced Techniques and Applications", pages from 13-27 to 13-34.

#3 Zauberberg

Zauberberg

    Gold Member

  • ChE Plus Subscriber
  • 2,728 posts

Posted 22 August 2010 - 10:43 AM

Attached below. Quite comprehensive. The book gives very illustrative description of what happens if the turbo-expander efficiency is under- or over-estimated.

Attached Files



#4 singh ar

singh ar

    Brand New Member

  • Members
  • 2 posts

Posted 23 August 2010 - 03:08 AM

dear Zauberberg,

thanks a lot for your quick response. It gave me some hope, but can i get the info regarding how to calculate the HI, hp & Q which are in page 13-29 of 'campbell -turboexpander efficiency", hopefully this might be in previous pages of this book. By the by Zauberberg this efficiency estimation can be applied to turbines in which air is a medium, because in air seperation plants the Turbines are used for providing refrigeration to the sum total heat leak in the cryogenic plant.


er efficiency is under- or over-estimated.
[/quote]

Edited by singh ar, 23 August 2010 - 03:09 AM.


#5 Zauberberg

Zauberberg

    Gold Member

  • ChE Plus Subscriber
  • 2,728 posts

Posted 23 August 2010 - 04:15 AM

For calculating enthalpy change (remember: at isentropic conditions S1 = S2), actual work/horsepower, and volumetric flow, please refer to any of the thermodynamic textbooks. You should be familiar with that already, especially if you are planning to work on detailed expander calculations.

#6 Zauberberg

Zauberberg

    Gold Member

  • ChE Plus Subscriber
  • 2,728 posts

Posted 26 August 2010 - 12:55 PM

Here's another guideline from the Phillips engineering manual (I have uploaded it in the Forum some few weeks ago):

"For expander-compressor preliminary designs, limit the adiabatic efficiency to 72% for the expander and 65% for the compressor. Use a 95% mechanical efficiency for transferring horsepower from the expander to the compressor."

It's always better to underestimate expander-compressor efficiencies since you can easily combat against excessively low temperatures by using J-T valve in parallel, or by running the De-C2 tower at higher pressures. On the other hand, if you overestimate expander efficiency, there is no other way to obtain lower process temperatures and that can cost you a lot.




Similar Topics