Jump to content



Featured Articles

Check out the latest featured articles.

File Library

Check out the latest downloads available in the File Library.

New Article

Product Viscosity vs. Shear

Featured File

Vertical Tank Selection

New Blog Entry

Low Flow in Pipes- posted in Ankur's blog

Polypropylene Pall Rings -tower Packing


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
8 replies to this topic
Share this topic:
| More

#1 drdave

drdave

    Gold Member

  • Members
  • 64 posts

Posted 23 July 2005 - 09:45 AM

biggrin.gif
Hello All,

PP Pall rings are versatile tower packing for absorption / stripping operated well below recommended use temperature by suppliers. It has been observed that it lasts longer .Here, I want to know :

What are the life indicating parameters to replace PP Pall rings with fresh lot?
For example,Can we say that tensile strength / compressive strength will change from specified level to some "not acceptable" level etc.

Thanks

Dattatreya

#2 Guest_Guest_drdave_*_*

Guest_Guest_drdave_*_*
  • guestGuests

Posted 27 July 2005 - 08:05 AM

biggrin.gif

Friends,

Ludwig has rightly mentioned in his book "applied Process design for chemical & petrochemical plants" Volume:2 2nd edition
Let me quote for the thread initiated ahead :
[/QUOTE]" As a general guide,plastic packings should not be selected to operate any closer than 40~50 deg_F of their softening point or the manufacturers recommended use temperature.These packings also deflect with time & temperature and compress thereby changing performance and increasing pressure drop"[QUOTE]

It indicates certain life of plastic packings qualitatively.
What are quantitative measures to check where life line ends precisely??????

From silent reaction of forum,I think there is no specific parameters but check physically & decide whether to throw away or else?????

Thanks wink.gif

#3 Ming Hooi

Ming Hooi

    Veteran Member

  • Members
  • 47 posts

Posted 27 July 2005 - 09:15 PM

Instead of checking the ring physically, why don't you check the performance of the absorption? for example, the pressure drop across the packing - has it increased drastically? or, your absorption capacity - is the output less concentrated?

#4 drdave

drdave

    Gold Member

  • Members
  • 64 posts

Posted 28 July 2005 - 11:23 AM

biggrin.gif
Hello MH.C.

Here,Pressure drop across packing does not reveal much as it is significantly higher at start of run & even after end of run of more than 10 years life.
Moreover,Outgoing ammonia concentration is not much deviating .System hydraulics indicate inherent more pressure drop than normally specified. Tower contains non-conventional size PP Pall rings since inception.
Hence, We are in search of other convincing ways & means to solve without crash shut down/process disturbance
.

Thanks

D.R.Dave

#5 siretb

siretb

    ChE Jedi

  • ChE Plus Subscriber
  • 304 posts

Posted 02 August 2005 - 06:31 AM

We have used for years plastic (PP) packings at temperatures in the range of 60-70°C. This is for scrubbing operation, where water is the main solvent.
We do see that the packings become a bit brittle, but performances are unaffected.
I would advise that, if you see too many fragments in the sumps, in the filters protecting the pumps, may be it's time to change the packing.
A bed lasts for years.

#6 drdave

drdave

    Gold Member

  • Members
  • 64 posts

Posted 02 August 2005 - 09:26 AM

biggrin.gif
Hello Sireth,

Thanks for giving check points to decide the packing life.

May you please provide difference of pressure drops for one lot of PP Pall rings (or plastic Ring packings) for Start of Run & End of Run in your case of scrubbing operation.

Dave
smile.gif

#7 siretb

siretb

    ChE Jedi

  • ChE Plus Subscriber
  • 304 posts

Posted 05 August 2005 - 06:06 AM

Well, our application is somewhat special, because we also handle a lot of solids in the liquids. Despite the high solids load (> 10 grams/liter) we have no very significant pressure increase due to packing deterioration. Nor do solids accumulate, unless they become sticky because of a procees deviation problem.
So I do not have really the information you are asking me. We see that pressure drop is stable versus time.
What I can tell you is that the initial pressure drop is somewhat higher than what we would calculate from the suppliers data. We think that this is because there is a"solids holdup" in the packing.
Again, we use water as the liquid solvent and temperature is moderate. The plants usually shut down once every 18 monthes of so. we inspect the packing, check the bed heigth, and "fill up" if needed. Definitly, the rings are more brittle after 18 monthes operation.
I would be very practical: As long as you have no problems with efficiency or pressure drop, no need to replace, as MH.C stated. I would use something better than Pall rings (CMR or the like). You may also consider structured packing, like MELLAPAK plastic. Breakage is less of a problem, the pressure drop is lower. We tend to move from dumped packings to structured packing, because of the lesser pressure drop, despite a higher cost.

#8 drdave

drdave

    Gold Member

  • Members
  • 64 posts

Posted 08 August 2005 - 11:50 AM

biggrin.gif
Hello Sireth,

Practically speaking,We have pressure drop problem in off gas treatment towers.
Tower hydraulic gives confirmation of more pressure drop than specified.But,There is no assurance on separation purity for top product which should not contain CO2 more than specified in PFD otherwise it can deteriorate our main process of melamine manufacturing.CMR#2 is one such option to tackle higher pressure drop problem.But, There is no way to confirm separation as desired for joint scrubber-stripper tower for NH3-CO2-H2O system.

Thanks

Dave

N.B. The base case is already discussed elsewhere separately in this forum.
sad.gif

#9

  • guestGuests
  • 0 posts

Posted 16 December 2005 - 11:34 AM

Hi all,

Dont know if your still discussing this issue, maybe you can pm me if you are

Cheers

Ned




Similar Topics