Jump to content



Featured Articles

Check out the latest featured articles.

File Library

Check out the latest downloads available in the File Library.

New Article

Product Viscosity vs. Shear

Featured File

Vertical Tank Selection

New Blog Entry

Low Flow in Pipes- posted in Ankur's blog

Peng-Robinson-Stryjek-Vera 2 Eos For Water?


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
1 reply to this topic
Share this topic:
| More

#1 adw07

adw07

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • 20 posts

Posted 26 November 2011 - 07:50 AM

Hi,

Looking for a little advice for the application I am developing. Without going in to too much detail, it is necessary to model 3-phase (oil/gas/water) separators and I am unsure whether I should consider the aqueous phase completely separately when doing equation of state (P-T flash) calculations.

Would using Peng-Robinson EOS be terribly bad for water (in which case I could use a simple correlation instead) or just a little inaccurate?

Not sure if it would cause convergence problems or similar, as most of the literature I've seen seems to disregard the water.

Any help appreciated.

#2 Chellani

Chellani

    Gold Member

  • Members
  • 78 posts

Posted 28 November 2011 - 11:18 AM

I am not sure what you are developing but here are few inputs
1. Your flash should figure that whether third phase (aqueous) exist or not. Peng Robinson's (PR) performs a three phase flash and estimates existence of third phase based on water's solubility in aqueous phase (using API correlation and few more corrections).
2. Yes PR is terrible for pure water. Try estimateing boiling point of water using PR at different pressures and cross-check with steam table. If you are sure that your system will have only water, using steam table (or property packages available in HYSYS based on steam table) would be good idea.




Similar Topics