Jump to content



Featured Articles

Check out the latest featured articles.

File Library

Check out the latest downloads available in the File Library.

New Article

Product Viscosity vs. Shear

Featured File

Vertical Tank Selection

New Blog Entry

Low Flow in Pipes- posted in Ankur's blog

Select Proper Exhaust Fan For Toluene Diisocyanate


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
1 reply to this topic
Share this topic:
| More

#1 deltaChe

deltaChe

    Gold Member

  • ChE Plus Subscriber
  • 153 posts

Posted 13 December 2012 - 10:26 AM

Dear Mr.and Ms.


The fan with exhaust air flow capacity = 35000m3/hr to be used to exhaust the TDI (toluene diisocyanate) fugitive emissions vapor with
feeding concentration 150 ppm TDI/Feeding flow rate=300m3/hr.Haven't said that , the PEL of TDI (permissible exposure limit) = 0.005 ppm
in a confined space 48m3.

I tried to verify the fan capacity is large enough to make this TDI concentration in the factory meet with PEL(0.005ppm).

First, I tried to get the Air changer rate per hour of this fan,

N = Q*60/V0
V0=A*H
Where
N = ideal number of air changes per hour , m3/hr
Q = the volume flow rate of air, m3/hr
V0= the space volume, m3
H = average height of the ceiling m3

From this formula, in our factory V0=48m3, Q=35000m3/hr
,so N=729.


But, if I assume the TDI ) fugitive emissions 0.1 Lpm(liter per minute),its required ACH
(air changer per hour) is form 19000~3900000.

Here the following is another calculation.

Q=G/C
Q:fan capacity [m3/hr]
G: TDI fugitive emission rate (0.1LPM = 0.036kg/hr, TDI density=6kg/m3) [kg/hr]
W= G*1000
C:permissible exposure limit of TDI = 0.005ppm)

Q=24.45*10^3*W/[C*M]]

M=molecular weight of TDI=175

So, I got Q=1005943 m3/hr which is bigger than vendor provide Q=35000 m3/hr


I have trouble to decide the emission rate of TDI in our plant is.


I really appreciated for any suggestion and help.

Thank you so much.

Attached Files


Edited by deltaChe, 19 December 2012 - 09:01 AM.


#2 deltaChe

deltaChe

    Gold Member

  • ChE Plus Subscriber
  • 153 posts

Posted 19 December 2012 - 09:03 AM

It seems this problem is too trivial to be commentted or the method approach to this problem is totally wrong and not make any sense.




Similar Topics