Jump to content



Featured Articles

Check out the latest featured articles.

File Library

Check out the latest downloads available in the File Library.

New Article

Product Viscosity vs. Shear

Featured File

Vertical Tank Selection

New Blog Entry

Low Flow in Pipes- posted in Ankur's blog

Why The Overpressure For Multiple Relief Device Is 16% And Why Not 10%


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
4 replies to this topic
Share this topic:
| More

#1 amolbhvsr

amolbhvsr

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • 13 posts

Posted 17 December 2012 - 06:44 AM

Why the Overpressure For Multiple Relief Device Is 16% And Why Not 10%?

#2 fallah

fallah

    Gold Member

  • ChE Plus Subscriber
  • 5,026 posts

Posted 17 December 2012 - 08:03 AM

amolbhvsr,

Because the set pressure for the last valve is to be considered at 105% of the design pressure; then 105 %*1.1= around 116 %.

#3 amolbhvsr

amolbhvsr

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • 13 posts

Posted 10 July 2013 - 01:36 AM

Why the allowable accumulation is 105% of MAWP? Why not more than 5%?



#4 fallah

fallah

    Gold Member

  • ChE Plus Subscriber
  • 5,026 posts

Posted 10 July 2013 - 03:03 AM

amolbhvsr,

In the case of multiple relief devices, the maximum accumulated pressure would be 116% of the vessel's MAWP....



#5 Lowflo

Lowflo

    Gold Member

  • ChE Plus Subscriber
  • 180 posts

Posted 10 July 2013 - 06:42 AM

I think the question is, why is it considered safe to allow the accumulation to reach 116% when multiple valves are used. Pressure vessels are conservatively designed - they have a high safety factor. The safety risk caused by allowing the vessel to reach 116% MAWP is very small, and very tolerable.






Similar Topics