Jump to content



Featured Articles

Check out the latest featured articles.

File Library

Check out the latest downloads available in the File Library.

New Article

Product Viscosity vs. Shear

Featured File

Vertical Tank Selection

New Blog Entry

Low Flow in Pipes- posted in Ankur's blog

Comparison Of Compressed Nitrogen Vs. Helium


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
6 replies to this topic
Share this topic:
| More

#1 dhuber

dhuber

    Brand New Member

  • Members
  • 5 posts

Posted 13 May 2013 - 11:04 AM

Hello all.  I have customers asking if they can use Nitrogen instead of Heluim in a compressed gas emergency inflation system due to availability and cost.  The Helium is currently compressed to ~4200 psig (290 Bar) at 21 degrees C in the system reservior.  The question I need to answer is do they need a larger reservior and/or a higher pressure rated reservior to have the same inflation volume of gas when the system is activated.  The pressure in the system bladders after activiation is ~2.5 psig (1.19 Bar) at 21 degrees c.

 

I have used Ankur's spreadsheet for calculating the z factor for these two gases.  I find little difference in the z factor values when I include the quantum gas correction factors in Tc and Pc for Helium.  I would have expected a significant difference (10-20%) in the required pre-activiation volume/pressure given the differences in the gas properties.  My calculations currently yielding about a 1% difference.  Is this a reasonable assumption?

 

Thank you for any feedback on this topic. 



#2 PaoloPemi

PaoloPemi

    Gold Member

  • Members
  • 550 posts

Posted 13 May 2013 - 11:58 AM

you can compare the ratio of densities at the two conditions of pressure with t = 21C

these have been calculated with PR

 

for Helium

p1=1.19 bar.a -> rho1 = 0.194 Kg/m3

p2=290 bar.a -> rho2 = 42 Kg/m3

rho2/rho1 = 216

 

for Nitrogen

p1=1.19 bar.a ->rho1 =1.36 Kg/m3

p2=290 bar.a -> rho2 = 298 Kg/m3

rho2/rho1 = 219



#3 dhuber

dhuber

    Brand New Member

  • Members
  • 5 posts

Posted 14 May 2013 - 06:13 AM

THank you.  THat seems to confirm my findings.



#4 dhuber

dhuber

    Brand New Member

  • Members
  • 5 posts

Posted 14 May 2013 - 06:36 AM

After looking into this further, and calculating the mass of the Nitrogen that would be in the system, I find this to be only about 1/2 of what I would expect it to be.  The Helium looks to be correct.  The initial volume in the high pressure cylinder is .0181 mThe final volume is 4.106 m3



#5 dhuber

dhuber

    Brand New Member

  • Members
  • 5 posts

Posted 14 May 2013 - 06:41 AM

After again looking at this I found my error regarding the Nitrogen mass.  Your original calculation is correct.

Thank you



#6 dhuber

dhuber

    Brand New Member

  • Members
  • 5 posts

Posted 14 May 2013 - 08:16 AM

My real question is regarding the z-factor calculation.  Is it appropriate to use the Newton correction factors for Pc and Tc  with quantum gases (in this case Helium)?  It makes a significant difference in the resultant compressibility factor.



#7 PaoloPemi

PaoloPemi

    Gold Member

  • Members
  • 550 posts

Posted 14 May 2013 - 08:37 AM

the values shown in my previous post have been calculated in Excel with the Peng Robinson package available in Prode Properties library, you may download a copy from prode.com if you wish to test.

For density or volume you can obtain values a bit more accurate with models as BWR which have specific parameters,

but I do not expect large differences,

I have also REFPROP and the results are quite close.






Similar Topics