Jump to content



Featured Articles

Check out the latest featured articles.

File Library

Check out the latest downloads available in the File Library.

New Article

Product Viscosity vs. Shear

Featured File

Vertical Tank Selection

New Blog Entry

Low Flow in Pipes- posted in Ankur's blog

- - - - -

Radiative Heat Loss From Outdoor Bare Pipe

heat loss

This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
2 replies to this topic
Share this topic:
| More

#1 chemguy22

chemguy22

    Brand New Member

  • Members
  • 3 posts

Posted 24 July 2013 - 06:32 PM

What is a good way to estimate the heat loss due to radiation from a bare pipe exposed to the outdoors?

 

I currently am working with this equation:

 

Q.radiation = α*( e1 T.outside.pipe^4 - e2 T.ambient^4 )*A (radiation)

A = Area of Radiating surface (m2)
T.outside.pipe = Temperature or radiating body (K) << to find out
T.ambient = Temperature or Suroundings (K)
α = Stefan Boltzman constant = 5,673 x 10-8 W m-2 K-4
e 1 = Emissivity of Radiating surface
e 2 = Emissivity of Surroundings

 

But I am wondering whether the emissivity of surroundings (i.e. the atmosphere, there are no buildings/structures immediately beside the section of exposed pipe) is significant??

 

Will the heat loss due to radiation be insignificant if there are no significant structures adjacent to the exposed pipe to absorb the radiation??

 

Any help or input would be greatly appreciated!



#2 Steve Hall

Steve Hall

    Gold Member

  • ChE Plus Subscriber
  • 167 posts

Posted 25 July 2013 - 07:09 AM

Your highest radiation loss is to interstellar space, if there are no structures or clouds in the way. This is why you can, theoretically, freeze water in the desert at temperatures approaching 20C. The siimplifying assumption is to set e2 = e1. Since you are raising the pipe temperature to the 4th power, if the temperature difference between pipe and environment is significant then the emissivity of the environment isn't very important. However, if the temperature difference is small then e2 can have a big influence on the calculation.



#3 chemguy22

chemguy22

    Brand New Member

  • Members
  • 3 posts

Posted 25 July 2013 - 08:44 AM

Great. Thank you very much Steve!






Similar Topics