Jump to content



Featured Articles

Check out the latest featured articles.

File Library

Check out the latest downloads available in the File Library.

New Article

Product Viscosity vs. Shear

Featured File

Vertical Tank Selection

New Blog Entry

Low Flow in Pipes- posted in Ankur's blog

Scrubber Design At Low Concentrations

scrubber

This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
1 reply to this topic
Share this topic:
| More

#1 BFly

BFly

    Brand New Member

  • Members
  • 1 posts

Posted 27 September 2013 - 06:43 AM

Dear all,

 

I am designing a simple scrubber to scrub an organic component from air to below 10 mg/Nm3 to allow emission to atmosphere. Scrubbing is done in a packed column using a large excess of water at atmospheric conditions.  The organic component is soluble in water (~1-2%). Water consumption is not really an issue since we can reuse it. 

 

We have the vapour-liquid equilibria by means of Henry coefficients for this highly non-ideal system and we trust those data. 

 

We don't have a lot of experience with scrubbers for scrubbing to low concentration. We are more used to designing distillation systems. And therefore we are approaching the design of the scrubber system in the same way: based on the physical properties we calculate the number of theoretical stages, multiply that with the height of a theoretical plate (HETP, typical from vendor using substantial overdesign), etc.

 

My question now is: is this approach still reliable when scrubbing to very low concentrations in the vapour phase? Or will the HETP be possibly very much larger (> 2 times) due to mass transfer limitations in the vapour phase for instance and is another approach required. Or is experimental verification in a column setup required?

 

Best regards,

 

Bernard



#2 breizh

breizh

    Gold Member

  • Admin
  • 6,334 posts

Posted 27 September 2013 - 07:02 AM

Bernard,

Probably good to read .

Hope this helps

 

Breizh


Edited by breizh, 27 September 2013 - 07:04 AM.





Similar Topics