Hi,
Why are instruments mounted on equipment and PSV flanges rated for minimum 300# rating.
Thanks in advance.
|
Posted 11 April 2017 - 11:20 PM
Hi,
Why are instruments mounted on equipment and PSV flanges rated for minimum 300# rating.
Thanks in advance.
Posted 12 April 2017 - 03:57 AM
Hi,
Why are instruments mounted on equipment and PSV flanges rated for minimum 300# rating.
Thanks in advance.
That is not a universal rule. Some companies follow this and some don't. The only way to logically explain this is to calculate nozzle loads (allowable forces and moments) based on connected piping / tubing for the PSV / Instrument and then decide the pound rating. However most engineering including vessel design is required to be completed before vendor data including weights for the instruments and / or PSVs is available. By over-designing for pound rating (300#) the design engineer is trying to ensure that the chances of a instrument / PSV nozzle on the vessel not able to bear the nozzle loads is minimized. This is a time saving measure in terms of allowing fabrication of equipment / vessels with higher pound rating for instruments / PSVs directly mounted on equipment / vessels. However, due diligence is required to ensure that if the process requires higher pressures than 300# the nozzle pound rating provided is able to cater to the process requirement.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Ankur
Interactive Vs Rating In Aspen PlusStarted by Guest_panoska_* , 22 May 2024 |
|
![]() |
||
Sil Rating Requirement For BurnersStarted by Guest_seuenergy_* , 13 Apr 2024 |
|
![]() |
||
Rating Of Existing Condensate Fractionator With New Heavy CondensateStarted by Guest_adnanaslam1988_* , 03 Feb 2024 |
|
![]() |
||
![]() Sieve Tray Rating In Aspen PlusStarted by Guest_Root_* , 24 Sep 2023 |
|
![]() |
||
Exchanger Design And Rating (Edr) In Aspen PlusStarted by Guest_panoska_* , 12 Mar 2023 |
|
![]() |