|


Phase Equilibria , Model Selection In Prode
#1
Posted 03 May 2018 - 02:56 PM
#2
Posted 03 May 2018 - 03:51 PM
for water-hydrocarbons phase equilibria the main differences (between Peng Robinson, PR and Peng Robinson Extended, PRX in Prode Properties) are due to the different alpha functions,
I think it is possible, within certain limits, reduce the differences including a temperature dependence in BIPs
but i do not see many advantages,
Peng Robinson (and Soave Redlich Kwong) are good for non-polar fluids,
for polar fluids there are alternatives (the Peng Robinson Extended in Prode Properties is an example)
#3
Posted 07 May 2018 - 08:54 AM
thanks Paolo,
I know that PRX has different alpha function,
I have a client which does these calc.s with Kabadi-Danner (which is not available in my Base version),
these streams include hydrocarbons, N2, CO2, H2S, water (up to 8 % mole fract.), methanol etc.
which model do you suggest ?
#4
Posted 07 May 2018 - 11:34 AM
Kabadi & Danner model (based on SRK) includes a composition dependence for water-hydrocarbons
aij = a1ij + a2ij * zw
a1ij = zi*zj*aij a2ij = zi*zw*awij
in Prode the awij's are icalculated only for water-hydrocarbons pairs (I believe the same in other simulators),
if you have other polar fluids (methanol etc.) better to use a extended EOS as PRX with complex mixing rules as Huron Vidal, in Prode Properties it is the PRX-NRTL (P-HV) model
in general I prefer PRX with complex mixing rules,
if BIPs are not present in Prode database, do use the data regression procedure...
Similar Topics
Hysis Vba Mixed Liquid Phase Data AccessStarted by Guest_Jose123123_* , 27 Dec 2022 |
|
![]() |
||
Two-Phase Flow Piping DesignStarted by Guest_Vegeta_* , 09 Dec 2022 |
|
![]() |
||
![]() Shrinking Core Model Application In Reactor DesignStarted by Guest_shimi7459_* , 11 Nov 2022 |
|
![]() |
||
Vapor Pressure Model Pl0Xant Has Missing ParametersStarted by Guest_Arun Teja_* , 22 Sep 2022 |
|
![]() |
||
Two Phase- Long Pipeline VelocityStarted by Guest_stu_* , 21 Aug 2022 |
|
![]() |