Jump to content



Featured Articles

Check out the latest featured articles.

File Library

Check out the latest downloads available in the File Library.

New Article

Product Viscosity vs. Shear

Featured File

Vertical Tank Selection

New Blog Entry

Low Flow in Pipes- posted in Ankur's blog

2

Should I Switch Majors If I Want To Live In Urban Areas After Graduati


3 replies to this topic
Share this topic:
| More

#1 xAlinkax

xAlinkax

    Brand New Member

  • Members
  • 1 posts

Posted 05 September 2025 - 07:28 AM

Currently a sophomore in engineering at a t25 school. I want to move to a large city after graduation ex: Chicago, Houston, SF. However it seems that one major drawback to Chem E is that many plants are in the middle of no where. What options/difficulties would I face if I wanted to live in a city?



#2 breizh

breizh

    Gold Member

  • Admin
  • 6,817 posts

Posted 05 September 2025 - 09:15 AM

Hi,

a) All engineering companies are in big cities.

B) My experience with US is Baton Rouge,Louisiana where factories are about 30 minutes' drive from City center. 

 

Breizh.



#3 latexman

latexman

    Gold Member

  • Admin
  • 1,853 posts

Posted 05 September 2025 - 04:17 PM

I see no difficulty. Just make living in a city one of your job search criteria your senior year.

#4 astro

astro

    Gold Member

  • Members
  • 114 posts

Posted Today, 07:29 AM

Speaking from the perspective of having worked in one of the biggest cities in the world (think London) and also working in a small country town in the middle of a place that you've probably never heard of, my response is - work out your personal priorities and follow that lead.

 

From my history, I can say that the temporal dynamic is that personal priorities change. Speaking from experience again, my focus changed from my personal priorities to priorities that went beyond myself (think family).

 

So, there's compromise and conflict at play. Sometimes career and non-career objectives align and sometimes they don't. When they don't, then it's a matter of deciding what is most important - career or non-career. The right decision when there's a conflict is a matter for the individual. From my own experience, there were times when I decided that I came first and others when I put my personal preference second.

 

How that translates across to your situation, only you can answer.

 

That said, (and in my opinion) you will be a more complete Chemical Engineer if your experience spans across design, operation and project delivery. That doesn't present as a possibility for everyone but I consider myself fortunate to have experience in all three areas to comment. To gain that experience, I've made sacrifices (e.g. working in a remote location to be in a position to manage a hazardous process plant - recognising that most modern communities don't want a hazardous process plant in their back yard). On reflection, those sacrifices were worth it .. for me.

 

All I can suggest is that you take a step back, disengage from all the advice that's being fired at you, back your judgement and see where it leads. No-one knows (except with hindsight) what the right answer is. However, if you're the one making the decision, I'm confident that you'll be satisfied with the end result, when you look back on how your career has developed 20+ years from now.

 

In short, go for it (you just need to define what "it" is).






Similar Topics