Dear all,
I'm facing in my office an internal discussion relevant to LS steam header protection, downstream a split range controlled let down station (2 x 100 t/h let-down with desuperheater, both in service but normally closed).
Let's suppose to have a HS header connected to a LS header through let down system made by 2 x 100 t/h pressure control valves (with desuperheater) controlled in split range from LS pressure.
Designing LS steam header PSV I have to suppose that both valves are driven open because the failure of controller ore one is enough???
Consider that LS header has also one vent 100 t/h capacity.
If the LS pressure controller would have high integrity level (e.g. 2oo3 Pressure transmitter) this would be enough?
Regards
Rob
|
|
Psv Design Downstream Split Range Letdown Station
Started by robmi, Nov 07 2007 03:54 PM
4 replies to this topic
Share this topic:
#1
Posted 07 November 2007 - 03:54 PM
#2
Posted 08 November 2007 - 09:50 AM
QUOTE (robmi @ Nov 7 2007, 03:54 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Dear all,
I'm facing in my office an internal discussion relevant to LS steam header protection, downstream a split range controlled let down station (2 x 100 t/h let-down with desuperheater, both in service but normally closed).
Let's suppose to have a HS header connected to a LS header through let down system made by 2 x 100 t/h pressure control valves (with desuperheater) controlled in split range from LS pressure.
Designing LS steam header PSV I have to suppose that both valves are driven open because the failure of controller ore one is enough???
I'm facing in my office an internal discussion relevant to LS steam header protection, downstream a split range controlled let down station (2 x 100 t/h let-down with desuperheater, both in service but normally closed).
Let's suppose to have a HS header connected to a LS header through let down system made by 2 x 100 t/h pressure control valves (with desuperheater) controlled in split range from LS pressure.
Designing LS steam header PSV I have to suppose that both valves are driven open because the failure of controller ore one is enough???
Not very clear with your question. Due to common controller failure, you need to consider two control valve FULL OPEN for PSV relief load on LS header.
QUOTE
If the LS pressure controller would have high integrity level (e.g. 2oo3 Pressure transmitter) this would be enough?
2oo3 voting increase reliability / availability of transmitter. However, controller failure remain an issue.
JoeWong
#3
Posted 16 November 2007 - 12:56 AM
I will appreciate if you briefly explain about:
-"Blow- By gas"
-"Let- Down Station"
-"HS-Header"
-"LS-Header"
Regards
-"Blow- By gas"
-"Let- Down Station"
-"HS-Header"
-"LS-Header"
Regards
#4
Posted 16 November 2007 - 06:26 AM
In the context of this thread, I believe LS-Header and HS-Header stand for the low pressure steam header and high pressure steam header, respectively. A let down station is a control valve of some sorts where the sole purpose is to drop the system pressure to some required amount in a very precise controlled fashion. This can be done with either a control loop (pressure transmitter and actuated valve) or a self contained pressure regulator.
As far a -"Blow- By gas" goes, I don't see this term used in this thread.
As far a -"Blow- By gas" goes, I don't see this term used in this thread.
#5
Posted 16 November 2007 - 11:22 AM
Dear Rob,
Could you make the drawing of your system and upload here so that it will be easier to analyse the problem.From your query it seems that you have 3 control valves out of which 2 are for let down and one one vent with the single split-range controller.
In case of controller fails and you find your two let down valves stick open fully and vent control valve sticks close then you have 200 Ton/hr of flow may be that would be the relieving load.I am not sure ignore it if it is wrong.
Please check the replies by other Jedies specially Mr Joe ,Mr Art and Mr Phill. After you will furnish the drawing I am sure they will come with the right solution to your query.
Could you make the drawing of your system and upload here so that it will be easier to analyse the problem.From your query it seems that you have 3 control valves out of which 2 are for let down and one one vent with the single split-range controller.
In case of controller fails and you find your two let down valves stick open fully and vent control valve sticks close then you have 200 Ton/hr of flow may be that would be the relieving load.I am not sure ignore it if it is wrong.
Please check the replies by other Jedies specially Mr Joe ,Mr Art and Mr Phill. After you will furnish the drawing I am sure they will come with the right solution to your query.
Similar Topics
Scrubber DesignStarted by Guest_syamsundar_menon_* , 02 Jul 2018 |
|
|
||
Lpg Plant DesignStarted by Guest_betulche_* , 08 Mar 2026 |
|
|
||
Psv Downstream Line SizingStarted by Guest_Abdessamed1961_* , 03 Mar 2026 |
|
|
||
Air Separation Plant DesignStarted by Guest_adda_* , 03 Mar 2026 |
|
|
||
Beginner Question: Inlet Separator Design In Aspen Hysys (Natural Gas,Started by Guest_NewEng2030_* , 12 Feb 2026 |
|
|

FB





