|

Downward Flow At Mole Sieve Bed
Started by manchester, Feb 01 2010 08:25 PM
4 replies to this topic
Share this topic:
#1
Posted 01 February 2010 - 08:25 PM
Hi,
I'm designing Mole Sieve Bed to remove water from Natural Gas. I got something that bother my mind...Why are wet gas entering bed from top of bed (downward flow)? Why don't they entering from the bottom,considering it is a gas?
My pre-analysis is that downward flow purpose is to reduce wet gas velocity,so that recidence time in bed is higher, then gas outgoing from bed will be drier.
Is this right??
Thanks a lot
I'm designing Mole Sieve Bed to remove water from Natural Gas. I got something that bother my mind...Why are wet gas entering bed from top of bed (downward flow)? Why don't they entering from the bottom,considering it is a gas?
My pre-analysis is that downward flow purpose is to reduce wet gas velocity,so that recidence time in bed is higher, then gas outgoing from bed will be drier.
Is this right??
Thanks a lot
#2
Posted 01 February 2010 - 09:34 PM
I think downward flow is preferred to prevent fluidizing the bed. If the flow of wet natural gas was introduced at the bottom of the bed, high gas velocities could "entrain" the adsorbent (usually a granular solid) and damage the bed. I interned at a plant that used PSA system to purify hydrogen and most of the catalyst/sorbent beds in the plant had the flow introduced to the top of the vessel. Also, the equipment you need to install to ensure even flow distribution of the gas across a bed is easiest to install at the top of a vessel. The flow direction and distribution considerations were briefly explained to me by one of the engineers at the plant so I don't have any books or print resources to back that up. Hope that helps.
#3
Posted 01 February 2010 - 11:57 PM
Down flow is preferred because up flow at high rates can cause fluidization of particles ,causing attrition and loss of fines.
Regards
Rahul
Regards
Rahul
Edited by rana680, 01 February 2010 - 11:57 PM.
#4
Posted 02 February 2010 - 07:32 PM
Down flow is preferred because up flow at high rates can cause fluidization of particles ,causing attrition and loss of fines.
Regards
Rahul
Thanks guys...you helped me very much
#5
Posted 03 February 2010 - 12:19 AM
hi there
just to add, ppl use up flow for back flushing. well, not sure whether it's a common practise.
just to add, ppl use up flow for back flushing. well, not sure whether it's a common practise.
Similar Topics
Heat Exchanger Steam FlowStarted by Guest_aliebrahem17_* , 25 Nov 2024 |
|
![]() |
||
![]() Flow Through Normally No Flow LineStarted by Guest_iippure_* , 08 Apr 2025 |
|
![]() |
||
![]() Flare Header Reverse FlowStarted by Guest_Ahmadhamzahperta_* , 04 Apr 2025 |
|
![]() |
||
![]() Dynamic Simulation After Feed Flow ReductionStarted by Guest_Kakashi-01_* , 20 Mar 2025 |
|
![]() |
||
Smr Reformer Flue Gas FlowStarted by Guest_kaidlut_* , 14 Feb 2025 |
|
![]() |