
http://www.cheresour...and-reputation/
We've had some time to live in the environment and I collected much feedback from the community. I wanted to raise this issue again to see how you think the current reputation system is working.
One drawback that we continue to run into is that newer community members don't really understand the feedback system and give unintended negative feedback.
What I've done as of this writing is to remove the negative feedback option and only allow positive feedback. Another option we have is instead of the "positive feedback" system, we could use a "Likes" system as shown here:
http://community.inv...356018-ipboard/
I'm interested to hear some more feedback. To review, our options are:
1. Positive and Negative feedback available
2. Positive feedback only
3. Likes system
As always, I'm open to changes that make as many as possible feel comfortable in contributing.
Thanks,
Chris
Nevertheless I have expressed opposition to three negative feedbacks so far, apart from personal cases. We have to encourage new contributions and lessen hesitation. That is why option 2, of Positive feedback only, can be tried and see the results. Exceptional posts could be treated by Administrator. The 'likes" system is not understood to be substantially different.
Feedbacks to members are like riches to men. Bypassing more general matters, a "poor" member may reply much better to a specific query. And the reader should judge the reply itself, not affected by "riches". Consequently reputation of a member had better be hidden somewhere in its profile, just for the member to recall the posts liked by others.