Jump to content



Featured Articles

Check out the latest featured articles.

File Library

Check out the latest downloads available in the File Library.

New Article

Product Viscosity vs. Shear

Featured File

Vertical Tank Selection

New Blog Entry

Low Flow in Pipes- posted in Ankur's blog

Cooling Tower Deck Nozzle Sizing


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
2 replies to this topic
Share this topic:
| More

#1 hazy

hazy

    Brand New Member

  • Members
  • 2 posts

Posted 08 October 2010 - 09:21 AM

I've been a member for a while but this is my 1st post. Thanks in advance for your help.

We're having 2 cells of a 3 cell cross-flow cooling tower demo'd and rebuilt, 30,000 gpm total recirculation rate. The rebuild was supposed to be in-kind; however, I just found out that the new edck nozzles are 1 1/4" compared to the old nozzles at 7/8". In addition, there are ~150 additional nozzles with the rebuild. I'm concerned, 1) We'll never hold a deck water level, 2) The third cell will be water starved (it's an add-on for debottleneck).

Is there a calculation/spreadsheet out there I could use to check my vendor's design and try to determine what happened with the nozzle size discrepancy? My calcs show the total new nozzle area to be 2651 in^2 vs. 1212 in^2 for the old nozzles.

I have a bad feeling about this...

Thanks,
Rick

#2 Guest_COOLINIT_*

Guest_COOLINIT_*
  • guestGuests

Posted 12 October 2010 - 02:23 PM

I've been a member for a while but this is my 1st post. Thanks in advance for your help.

We're having 2 cells of a 3 cell cross-flow cooling tower demo'd and rebuilt, 30,000 gpm total recirculation rate. The rebuild was supposed to be in-kind; however, I just found out that the new edck nozzles are 1 1/4" compared to the old nozzles at 7/8". In addition, there are ~150 additional nozzles with the rebuild. I'm concerned, 1) We'll never hold a deck water level, 2) The third cell will be water starved (it's an add-on for debottleneck).

Is there a calculation/spreadsheet out there I could use to check my vendor's design and try to determine what happened with the nozzle size discrepancy? My calcs show the total new nozzle area to be 2651 in^2 vs. 1212 in^2 for the old nozzles.

I have a bad feeling about this...

Thanks,
Rick



Rick,

If you are now planning on putting the original 30,000 GPM total flow (10,000 GPM per Cell) over two cells instead of three than the nozzles orifice size and/or the number of nozzles would have to be increased. The nozzles should be sized to maintain four to six inches of head above the nozzles. I have been in the cooling tower repair, upgrade, design & construction business for 30 plus years and have accumulated a number of flow charts, curves, etc. for varouis metered orifice nozzles. If you would like, please do not hesitate to email me with the type of nozzle you have, flow rates, number of nozzles, or whatever info you have to determine the flow rate (GPM) per nozzle and I will send you what applicable info I have.

Thanks and have a great day!

W. Kyle Arthur, Sr.
COOLINIT Corporation

email: wkarthur@aol.com

#3 hazy

hazy

    Brand New Member

  • Members
  • 2 posts

Posted 28 October 2010 - 02:59 PM

Kyle,

Sorry for the very late reply. We are putting 2/3 of the flow over 2 cells which is the same as previous. I received the tables that the vendor used to size the new nozzles and realized his design data which we supplied was old and incorrect. I had the tower manufacturer remove the 1 1/4" nozzles and replace them with the original size of 1". Hot water return deck levels have been very good post-startup with no issues.

Thanks again for you reply.

Rick




Similar Topics