Jump to content



Featured Articles

Check out the latest featured articles.

File Library

Check out the latest downloads available in the File Library.

New Article

Product Viscosity vs. Shear

Featured File

Vertical Tank Selection

New Blog Entry

Low Flow in Pipes- posted in Ankur's blog

Asme Sec Viii Ug-127 And Ug-131: Kd Vs Kr


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
1 reply to this topic
Share this topic:
| More

#1 seetheforest

seetheforest

    Brand New Member

  • Members
  • 5 posts

Posted 13 March 2012 - 03:34 PM

Hi,

I have a question that has been bothering me for a while. In UG-127(a)(2)(a)(3), ASME states that rupture disks must not exceed a coefficient of discharge, KD, of 0.62.

However, I must say that I am mystified by the difference between the coefficient of discharge, KD, and the flow resistance coefficient, KR.

Moving to section UG-131(e), there is a definition of the coefficient of discharge and an equation (Wt = 51.5 A*P) to which the coefficient of discharge can be applied (Appendix 11). However, in UG-131(k)-® ASME starts defining the flow through a burst rupture disk in terms of KR--flow resistance.

My question boils down to... what's the difference between KR and KD? Can I use KR in the Wt = 51.5 A*P equation?

Or, more generally, if I calculate my own theoretical flow through a valve or an orifice, should I multiply that value by the appropriate KD or KR that I can get from the valve manufacturer? And why does UG-127 set a limit for the rupture disk KD if rupture disks are always characterized by KR?

I'm somewhat confused. :)

Edited by seetheforest, 13 March 2012 - 03:34 PM.


#2 Shivshankar

Shivshankar

    Gold Member

  • Members
  • 257 posts

Posted 14 March 2012 - 03:08 AM

Hi Seeforest,

Please go through article (blog ) by ankur on, read it carefully, I hope you will understand the difference between Kr and Kd and when to use it.

http://www.cheresour...ngineers-part-2

Regards
Shivshankar




Similar Topics