@processengbd
an off-side question; fear I may be panned by other for this!
you said you are an iso certified company with a good engineering team; what are the internal comments on the question?
regards
neelakantan
|
Posted 26 May 2014 - 04:17 AM
@processengbd
an off-side question; fear I may be panned by other for this!
you said you are an iso certified company with a good engineering team; what are the internal comments on the question?
regards
neelakantan
Posted 09 June 2014 - 12:46 PM
Dear All
I have a query related to the type of three phase separator that is to be selected.
As specified in Shell DEP, "a three phase separator with a boot is selected when the vol. flowrate of heavier phase is less than 5% of the inlet flow and de-oiling of the heavy phase is not critical" while for " a separator with a weir arrangement is used where the IL is ill defined and the de-oiling of heavy phase is required."
My query is,
1) How can we define that the interface is well defined or ill-defined.
2) I have a three phase feed where my heavy phase flow is less than 5% and the deoiling of the heavy phase is also required. So in this case what type of separator should i select- three phase separator with a boot or with a weir arrangement? Also pls suggest whether a three phase settler with a boot can also have a weir plate at the end?
Regards
Pallavi
Edited by pallavikhatri, 09 June 2014 - 12:50 PM.
Posted 09 June 2014 - 02:34 PM
We might be able to help if you tell us what the fluid is.
Bobby
Posted 09 June 2014 - 10:50 PM
The fluid is water, oil and gases rich in C1 to C4. Basically this is the condensate stream at the outlet of a slug catcher which is going to a flash drum to recover the gases.
Regards
Pallavi
Posted 10 June 2014 - 01:51 AM
the idea of using a boot is to provide a 'height for de-hydrocarbonating" of heavier phase assume gravity settling is effective. you can have a bigger vessel dia to provide the same height for the heavy phase or provide a leg/boot.
in your case, if the condensate is not emulsive (based on the chemicals u/s), you can use a vessel with weir and boot
regards
neelakantan
PS:
1) why you use shell DP? client is specifying?
2) what are the client process spec/ design basis?
Edited by Neelakantan, 10 June 2014 - 01:52 AM.
Posted 10 June 2014 - 09:31 AM
Dear Neelankantan
Thanks for your reply.
Yes the fluid in my case is not emulsive. In my case the quantity of the heavy fluid is less than 5% so in this case a boot is sufficient. Then what is the use of providing a weir in the separator since the L/L interface will be formed inside the boot if I am not wrong?
Regards
Pallavi
Posted 11 June 2014 - 04:09 AM
weir side is for L/G interphase level control; vessel side will have fixed level (overflow level)
http://www.enggcyclo...uid-separation/
regards
neelakantan
Posted 11 June 2014 - 04:30 AM
Thanks for sharing this link but still it is not clear from the link that how providing a boot will enhance the separation.
Regards
Pallavi
Posted 11 June 2014 - 09:24 AM
Sounds like you need to review the fundamentals of liquid-liquid separation. And the phase behavior in three-phase separators.
Bobby
Posted 11 June 2014 - 11:29 AM
@palllavi,
submit your calculations of the three phase separator without boot but with a weir only; then me or more knowledgeable members can help you to see how size (dia) may reduce if you use a boot!
regards
neelakantan
Refinery Lpg Deethanizer Column DesignStarted by Guest_Ilyes_* , 15 Feb 2025 |
|
![]() |
||
![]() Liquid Liquid Separator SizingStarted by Guest_Kentucky08_* , 03 Apr 2025 |
|
![]() |
||
Alkaline Electrolytic Cell/stack Sizing/design For H2 ProductionStarted by Guest_BRS09_* , 13 Mar 2025 |
|
![]() |
||
![]() Separator Sizing Step By Step ProcedureStarted by Guest_krishnamurthy_* , 06 Apr 2023 |
|
![]() |
||
![]() Heat Exchanger Network DesignStarted by Guest_Kakashi-01_* , 21 Feb 2025 |
|
![]() |