Dear Rahul,
1. The purpose of a control valve is to control the flow or pressure drop of fluid across the valve by presenting some sort of resistance to flow based on throttling the fluid, and for this, some minimum throttling is always needed before we are actually controlling the fluid and making a difference in the value.
2. If you select the valve trim to be the same as the line size, then there is a considerable amount of throttling required before you can actually make an observable difference to the fluid flow or pressure. So, you are essentially wasting the top end range of your control valve and only able to effectively control after you reach much lesser control valve opening %. And Control Valves are quite expensive, so this wastage of the top end is not preferred.
3. So, to avoid this, the valve opening is typically kept to a size less than the line size. This leads to you being able to control the fluid quite soon as your valve opening is changed, and thus you don't waste any operational section (% opening) of the control valve without being able to control the fluid.
A desirable valve control range would be to operate it at 60-80% of valve opening for the maximum flow case.
4. The valve size is typically never greater than the line size, because that leads to very poor control, for the very same reason as explained above. Also, once operational (once the valve opening reaches a value where it affects fluid flow), such a valve will have increased sensitivity, so even a small change in valve opening causes a very large change in the fluid which is undesirable.
5. Now, as discussed in point 3, since the valve opening is kept to a lesser size than the line size, we require to add a reducer and expander before and after the valve in order to connect the valve to the line.
Regards,
Shantanu
Edited by shantanuk100, 17 March 2016 - 08:58 PM.