Jump to content



Featured Articles

Check out the latest featured articles.

File Library

Check out the latest downloads available in the File Library.

New Article

Product Viscosity vs. Shear

Featured File

Vertical Tank Selection

New Blog Entry

Low Flow in Pipes- posted in Ankur's blog

Saft Vs Cpa (Cubic Plus Association) In Prode

saft cpa phase equilibria prode

This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
1 reply to this topic
Share this topic:
| More

#1 bponcet

bponcet

    Junior Member

  • Members
  • 24 posts

Posted 07 October 2016 - 07:07 AM

with Prode, for mixtures of hydrocarbons with small amounts of water and other chemicals,
as an alternative to PRX models (say the PRX-NRTL-HV suggested in manual)  for pressures above 30 atm, should I prefer SAFT models or CPA models ? 

It seems that convergence is less reliable when association contribution is included.



#2 PaoloPemi

PaoloPemi

    Gold Member

  • Members
  • 459 posts

Posted 07 October 2016 - 08:22 AM

in previous posts (in this forum) I mentioned my preference for PR-NRTL-HV or SRK-NRTL-HV models,
the modified versions available in Prode Properties do a decent job with hydrocarbons plus water, chemicals, hydrates etc.
For water (or other compounds which have the capability of forming hydrogen bounds) CPA may be more accurate but slower (compared to PR-NRTL-HV or similar models), CPA is a combination of a EOS (SRK or PR) with the association term of Wertheim, used in SAFT,
CPA requires a separate solver (with a few derivatives solved numerically) , as result some procedures (for example critical points) may not work reliably in some cases.    
SAFT (with association) is even more complex (it requires to solve volume plus association), of course there are specific fields of application for these models, 
but, for hydrocarbons, where possible, I would prefer the modified PR or SRK models. 

Edited by PaoloPemi, 07 October 2016 - 08:25 AM.





Similar Topics