Calculated WABT is OK. Formulas for WABT can be found using google.
It is not clear to me though why you spent time on calculating WHSV and WABT as I don't see what you would use that for. Was that your supervisor's idea? And why WHSV instead of GHSV ?
I know from designs by reputable licensors that I saw through the years that HTS cat volume for SMR is roughly 0.5 liter per Nm3/h hydrogen product (based on a typical bulk density of 1200 kg/m3 that gives about 0.6 kg per Nm3/h). If you feel that it would sound better (more "scientific") I could calculate what typical GHSV an HTS in a licensed SMR uses.
If you have to justify that number you can either say that it comes from a personal communication with an experienced process design specialist or you can try to find typical HTS cat quantity data on the internet using google, which will be tough.
Note that you used more typicals in your design that I proposed based on my experiences with licensed designs.
If I remember well you set the reformer outlet pressure at 20 bar, so the WGSR inlet pressure will actually be something like 19.7 bar (there is some pressure drop over the WHB) and its outlet pressure say 19.4 bar.
For heat and mass balance WGS pressure is not relevant as WGS equilibrium is not affected by pressure (no change in total moles of gas) and for enthalpies it does not matter as we assumed ideal gas behavior, which is valid.
Impact of WGS pressure on kinetics is very small (only a few kg of cat), which is why I did not comment on it before when I saw you using 20 bar, as I did not want to fuss about details knowing you are pressed for time.