A modification in our process demands to design a heat exchanger for heating nitrogen gas to 90 °C from 30 °C. For nitrogen gas I am using specific heat at constant pressrue (Cp) for calculations. I am not sure about the specific heat at constant volume (Cv). Should I use Cp or Cv? What is the difference between these two? I mean how to apply this in real application.
My question is simple. When to use Cp and when to use Cv?
I quite agree with Ankur, I have not recalled having used Cv ever. Cv could be used when heating e.g. a gas quantity stored in an isolated drum, though I would rather use enthalpies instead.
Probably question was created because there is some frictional pressure loss in the exchanger, so ingoing nitrogen does not have same pressure as outgoing nitrogen. At any case difference in pressures is small compared to the operating pressure of nitrogen, you can also consider Cp at average (ingoing - outgoing) pressure. As far as as nitrogen is flowing, Cp should be used. In a more general case, you can use enthalpies in / out to calculate the heat exchanged.
You have to look into the case of nitrogen isolated in the exchanger, while heating medium circulates. This reminds the "gas stored in an isolated drum", yet using Cv may not be the case: Temperature of isolated nitrogen shall be taken same as max temperature of the heating medium (better to consider design temperature of heating medium for safety), and let calculated Pn be the resulting pressure of isolated nitrogen. If design pressure of nitrogen is higher than Pn, no PRV is needed (high temperature to be considered for design conditions). Otherwise API 520/521 recommends a formula for sizing the PRV (gas expansion) that is remembered not to contain Cv (I am not at work to be more specific looking at API).
Probably Cv is easier to measure in laboratories, then Cp is calculated using known formulas.
Edited by kkala, 20 February 2010 - 04:28 PM.