Jump to content



Featured Articles

Check out the latest featured articles.

File Library

Check out the latest downloads available in the File Library.

New Article

Product Viscosity vs. Shear

Featured File

Vertical Tank Selection

New Blog Entry

Low Flow in Pipes- posted in Ankur's blog

Psv Glycol Contactor


This topic has been archived. This means that you cannot reply to this topic.
2 replies to this topic
Share this topic:
| More

#1 nachop

nachop

    Brand New Member

  • Members
  • 4 posts

Posted 05 June 2014 - 07:01 PM

Hi !

 

I have some trouble with a PSV in glycol contactor. 

 

The vendors (fabricators) have a practice to throw in a 1" x 2" PSV with a 'D' orifice on most glycol contactors and say it’s sufficient for the fire case.  It may be correct, the PSV may never pop in the next 15 years.  Then comes upgrading and modifications to the plant and engineering maybe asked to find out if the PSV is adequate.

 

What is the latent heat of triethylene glycol which is about 60% pure, 30% water and the 10% C5+ at the relieving conditions?  ( Set pressure 80 kg/cm2g).  I look for it in Hysys but the mass heat of vaporization results too low. API 521 gives a minimum value of 115 Kj/kg for a HC mixture.  Is that correct?

 

What happens to the contactor in a fire case?

 

Thank you in advance
 


Edited by Art Montemayor, 07 June 2014 - 12:42 AM.
Readability, grammar


#2 fallah

fallah

    Gold Member

  • ChE Plus Subscriber
  • 5,019 posts

Posted 05 June 2014 - 11:22 PM

nachop,

 

If the only credible scenario for the glycol contactor is fire case; fabricator practice to consider a small PSV on such contactor could be right and he/she considers the PSV mostly for code compliance because in most cases a PSV cannot protect a pressure vessel from failure in fire case.



#3 ColinR33

ColinR33

    Gold Member

  • Members
  • 106 posts

Posted 06 June 2014 - 09:36 AM

What really happens is you will boil off what little bit of water there is absorbed in the TEG plus any condensed HC, a very small load.  The TEG itself will not vaporize at those pressures, it will "cook" (thermally degrade into sludge) and not contribute any significant amount to the relief load.  There will be some gas expansion effects as well, but this is a very smal relief area requirement.  A 1D2 PSV provides more than enough relief area for these scenarios.  If you want to be VERY conservative you could calculate the fire vaporization relief load assuming the liquid is the tower is completely water or HC liquid.  The water will have a higher heat of vaporization but lower MW, while the HC will have a lowe heat of vaporization but a higher MW, so check both, but this is really not necessary.

 

The only other real relief load possibility is if you have a pressure letdown valve immediately upstream of the contactor and the PSV has to be sized for gas blowthrough in the event of a control failure.






Similar Topics